Notices


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 1,255 | Thanked: 393 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ US
#1
Big difference. Archos 5 plays every video I compared smooth, but only up to Flash 8 (all that A5 supports).

Is Flash Lite a mobile Flash app and 9.4 a desk top version?

Flash 10.1 should rock if performs as good as Flash Lite on the Archos. Plays smooth embedded or not and the videos look better.

Again, both devices (last year's A5) have same chipset.
 
ARJWright's Avatar
Posts: 861 | Thanked: 734 times | Joined on Jan 2008 @ Nomadic
#2
Flash 9.4 is much heavier and needs beefer systems- in effect, its not designed for handhelds. Flash Lite is designed for the minimal resource needs of mobile devices, and hence why it works so well. Really, Flash Lite should have been the natural evolution of Flash all over, but hey, Macromedia/Adobe made decisions for whatever reasons.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to ARJWright For This Useful Post:
aikon800's Avatar
Posts: 117 | Thanked: 43 times | Joined on Nov 2007
#3
So Flash 10.1 should perform as Flash Lite, since its using hardware acceleration ??? or is it similar to flash 9.4 (which is like a desktop version)
 
Posts: 1 | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Boston
#4
I think performance will always tie back to the device just like it does on the desktop (if you have a slow computer with no Ram, any version of Flash will seem sluggish). I'm sure Adobe will work with OEM's to get flash 10.1 optimized for certain partners, after that there'll probably be baseline device requirements in order for other devices to have well performing flash.
 
Reply

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:35.