![]() |
2010-01-09
, 00:24
|
Banned |
Posts: 291 |
Thanked: 42 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#62
|
Don't they require research anymore when pursuing a Masters degree? Do you need to cite the sources of your insight or can you now pretty much make stuff up as you go along?
![]() |
2010-01-09
, 00:25
|
Posts: 3,428 |
Thanked: 2,856 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#63
|
![]() |
2010-01-09
, 00:30
|
Posts: 474 |
Thanked: 283 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Oxford, UK
|
#64
|
All Apache is doing is serving dumb HTML pages. It is good for nothing but that. Each serious site that has Apache as a front facing web server has another real web server doing the heavy lifting in the middle-tier: IIS, WebSphere, Weblogic. Pick your poison.
That's why all those stats are skewed. Apache is nothing but a very simple fast web-server that on its own is good for nothing. It always has to rely on some commercial middle-tier.
![]() |
2010-01-09
, 00:32
|
Banned |
Posts: 291 |
Thanked: 42 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#65
|
![]() |
2010-01-09
, 00:35
|
Banned |
Posts: 291 |
Thanked: 42 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#66
|
Apache is unlikely to be the front end to a Windows-based page generation system, simply because many of them are suited to working with IIS, especially the .NET ones. Which tells you everything you need to know about what backends are widely used when Apache is leading the stats at the front end....
![]() |
2010-01-09
, 05:10
|
Posts: 21 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#67
|
![]() |
2010-01-09
, 05:13
|
Posts: 21 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#68
|
YouDude wrto to your bank using Apache, did you actually read what you posted?
"IBM Apache web server"? I didn't know such thing existed.
Then the next line talks about using it with WebSphere
Thank you for supporting my original argument that Apache alone is nothing.
![]() |
2010-01-09
, 06:05
|
Posts: 3,428 |
Thanked: 2,856 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#69
|
![]() |
2010-01-09
, 07:06
|
Posts: 474 |
Thanked: 283 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Oxford, UK
|
#70
|
There within lies the problem with the argument. ISS contains more than just HTTP/s serving.
As far as enterprise implementation, the reason why bank, large companies, etc use ISS or something similar is that they can sue the crap out Microsoft if the system is compromised. In every large company/organization I have ever worked for, I have asked why they used commercial products such as ISS over open source and the answer has always been “to have somebody to hold liable when it all goes down.”
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net