The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to RevdKathy For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-12-17
, 09:17
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 199 |
Thanked: 264 times |
Joined on May 2009
@ turku, finland
|
#92
|
The benefits of that approach would have to be weighed against the inconvenience (and resulting consequences) for new users who sign up just to post a unique insightful thread with potential to enrich the lives of all community members.
![]() |
2009-12-17
, 09:23
|
|
Posts: 2,173 |
Thanked: 2,678 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Cornwall, UK
|
#93
|
what about having the first thread created by the user to go through moderation before it appears on the site? once you have an approved thread, you're allowed to start new threads without passing moderation. this approach works well for wordpress comments in my experience.
this gives the moderator a chance to
- give a personal welcome to the new tmo member
- prevent duplicate threads from being started
- all in all give good advice on the specific issue, should it not seem to be a good idea for a new thread to be created.
- and also, even if the thread is perfectly fine, the moderator could send a generic welcome dm to confirm approval, including good tips and tricks for tmo.
![]() |
2009-12-17
, 09:29
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 199 |
Thanked: 264 times |
Joined on May 2009
@ turku, finland
|
#94
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to edgar2 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-12-17
, 16:19
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#95
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2009-12-24
, 15:20
|
Posts: 336 |
Thanked: 610 times |
Joined on Apr 2008
@ France
|
#96
|
![]() |
2009-12-24
, 15:31
|
|
Posts: 3,203 |
Thanked: 1,391 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Worthing, England
|
#97
|
Hi,
Could we have a status update regarding edgar2's and my own candidacies? Regardless of the respective decisions, it would be nice if there could be some kind of communication with the involved parties.
Thanks,
(damn I sound like a manager)
![]() |
2010-01-09
, 13:04
|
Posts: 336 |
Thanked: 610 times |
Joined on Apr 2008
@ France
|
#98
|
![]() |
2010-01-11
, 15:20
|
|
Posts: 1,436 |
Thanked: 3,144 times |
Joined on Jul 2005
|
#100
|
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Reggie For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
Tags |
moderator |
Thread Tools | |
|
The thread which sparked this thread was several pages old before I got to it. If a mod had moved it to the 'competitors' forum when it was fresh, I suspect the flames would have died in the low-oxygen atmosphere there. Equally, once it was well alight, a 'fire door' policy of closing it with a statement to the effect that it has become too agressive and would be -reopened when tempers are cooled would have stopped it deteriorating, and it could have been reopened quietly in a few days time when it was on the 6th page.
The effect of this would be that people who have constructive criticism to offer would still get their chance to post and contribute, while the rabble rousers and pitch-fork brigade would learn very quickly that their behaviour was unrewarded.
Please don't see this as a criticism of the existing mods: I know they do a tremendous job and what I'm suggesting would be yet more work.
Edit to add: I've been in places where n00b restrictions were of various ty[es, but I really don't think preventing new thread posting would work. Many of our n00bs turn up, ask a question they can't find an answer to anywhere else, get an answer and never reappear. I'd hate to lose that facility for people who're stuck on something.
Hi! I'm Kathy and I'm a Maemo Greeter! Welcome.
Useful links for newcomers: New members say hello , New users start here, Community subforum, Beginners' wiki page, Maemo5 101, Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Did you know Meego.com has forums too?