|
2010-01-22
, 16:11
|
Posts: 10 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Washington, DC
|
#72
|
|
2010-01-23
, 16:23
|
|
Posts: 1,030 |
Thanked: 792 times |
Joined on Jun 2009
|
#73
|
|
2010-01-25
, 16:03
|
Posts: 10 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Washington, DC
|
#74
|
|
2010-01-28
, 01:53
|
|
Posts: 1,030 |
Thanked: 792 times |
Joined on Jun 2009
|
#75
|
|
2010-01-28
, 15:49
|
Posts: 104 |
Thanked: 40 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#76
|
|
2010-01-28
, 18:36
|
Posts: 67 |
Thanked: 7 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Netherlands
|
#78
|
|
2010-01-28
, 18:45
|
Posts: 10 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Washington, DC
|
#79
|
|
2010-01-28
, 23:52
|
|
Posts: 1,030 |
Thanked: 792 times |
Joined on Jun 2009
|
#80
|
After speaking to engineers at companies who are far smarter than myself, it is their belief that the firmware in the wl1251 chipset is preventing the collection of data packets while in monitor mode.
I have personally tried damn near all the suggestions here in this thread. Nothing, and I mean nothing, works to collect data packets.
The ONLY data packets I CAN collect are my own when connected to a network which defeats the purpose of Kismet and Aircrack.
So, I am becoming more and more convinced that until someone produces a hacked firmware binary, we will NOT be collecting data packets while in monitor mode.
However, I would really love to see someone more capable than myself prove me wrong!
Good luck, fellas!
Geezer