Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Reply
Thread Tools
sjgadsby is offline sjgadsby
2010-03-08 , 16:57
Posts: 5,335 | Thanked: 8,187 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Pennsylvania, USA
#11
Originally Posted by noobmonkey View Post
remember not all are tecnically dev's though... There is alot to pickup - so getting it all right first time is a challenge...

So sometimes its just making sure that when they look for help its a pleasure and not a chore
I'm hoping, as the QA process and team evolve, they're able to be seen less as a barrier to, and antagonists of, Maemo development. Along those lines, might it make sense to provide developers with a easy to use, and easy to find, method of requesting a QA team review of an application while the app is still in -devel? New (or not-so-new) developers could then get (hopefully friendly, helpful, guiding) feedback on their packaging, etc. earlier. It might help avoid and reduce some of the hard feelings developers seem to be experiencing when packages fail QA, particularly for "technicality" issues.
__________________
maemo.org profile
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to sjgadsby For This Useful Post:
qole's Avatar
qole is offline qole
2010-03-09 , 05:39
Moderator | Posts: 7,109 | Thanked: 8,820 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Vancouver, BC, Canada
#12
I just want to mention that one of the problems you might have seen ("xsbc-bugtracker:" at the beginning of the field) is not an indication that the developer isn't taking things seriously; it is an indication that the developer is using py2deb to package his/her product. I had to patch py2deb myself to fix this problem, and Khertan has supposedly patched other peoples' versions individually, but I'm not sure he ever released an updated version to the repository.
__________________
qole.org --- twitter --- Easy Debian wiki page
Please don't send me a private message, post to the appropriate thread.
Thank you all for your donations!
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to qole For This Useful Post:
zerojay's Avatar
zerojay is offline zerojay
2010-03-09 , 11:18
Posts: 2,669 | Thanked: 2,555 times | Joined on Apr 2007
#13
Originally Posted by qole View Post
I just want to mention that one of the problems you might have seen ("xsbc-bugtracker:" at the beginning of the field) is not an indication that the developer isn't taking things seriously; it is an indication that the developer is using py2deb to package his/her product. I had to patch py2deb myself to fix this problem, and Khertan has supposedly patched other peoples' versions individually, but I'm not sure he ever released an updated version to the repository.
That's the case with my stuff. Thanks for bringing that up.
 
noobmonkey's Avatar
noobmonkey is offline noobmonkey
2010-03-09 , 11:19
Posts: 3,203 | Thanked: 1,391 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Worthing, England
#14
Originally Posted by qole View Post
I just want to mention that one of the problems you might have seen ("xsbc-bugtracker:" at the beginning of the field) is not an indication that the developer isn't taking things seriously; it is an indication that the developer is using py2deb to package his/her product. I had to patch py2deb myself to fix this problem, and Khertan has supposedly patched other peoples' versions individually, but I'm not sure he ever released an updated version to the repository.
Yeah, he has been helpful - sorted mine out quickly.

He has created his own repo and the new version works well
Good to see developers making developers tools so to speak
__________________
----------- Follow me on Twitter here
----------- My Photography Website and Blog is here
----------- Author of the N900 Health Check Application ----------- New Version in Extras Devel (Dec 2010 - 2.9.10)
----------- Are you on the N900 World Map? - http://pininthemap.com/maemo - masterpin: shotgun
----------- What apps do you want to see on the n900 or in MeeGo in the future? -
 
qole's Avatar
qole is offline qole
2010-03-09 , 21:09
Moderator | Posts: 7,109 | Thanked: 8,820 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Vancouver, BC, Canada
#15
I think it is terribly ironic that the developer of the packaging sofware I use doesn't use the Extras repository.

noobmonkey: You didn't tell me, are you using py2deb or pypackager?
__________________
qole.org --- twitter --- Easy Debian wiki page
Please don't send me a private message, post to the appropriate thread.
Thank you all for your donations!
 
EIPI's Avatar
EIPI is offline EIPI
2010-03-10 , 12:49
Posts: 794 | Thanked: 784 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ /Canada/Ontario/GTA
#16
Originally Posted by VDVsx View Post
We are also working in a checklist for developers with all the links, in order to smooth the testing process: http://wiki.maemo.org/Prepare_your_a...on_for_testing
Awesome! Thank you for this. I will be putting MaeFlight into -Testing soon hopefully.
__________________
Mobile Tablets Blog
Follow me on Twitter
 
benny1967's Avatar
benny1967 is offline benny1967
2010-03-11 , 19:30
Posts: 3,790 | Thanked: 5,718 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ Vienna, Austria
#17
just an idea:
once there's broad consensus about what certainly is *not* a valid bugtracker, could the package interface check that, too? the way it already detects missing bug tracker links?

you certainly cannot make the machine read the wiki and check if all criteria are met... but there could be something like a blacklist based on either regular expressions or a simple string comparison.

think of the following situation: a devoloper puts package A, version 0.1 in -testing. bugtracker: talk maemo.org. - it's soon clear that talk.maemo.org is not a valid bugtracker (a specific thread might be, don't know), so there's a few thumbs down from people who know the rules. but there's also thumbs up rom those who don't care and simply think the application is cool.

a week later, the same developer puts version 0.2 in testing, along with a new package B. again, all bug tracker fields contain only talk.maemo.org. - what will happen is a race between those voting up and those voting down.... and some version may still escape to extras.

putting talk.maemo.org on the blacklist as soon as it's first seen could prevent this and wouldn't require attention of the testers wrt subsequent packages.
 
qole's Avatar
qole is offline qole
2010-03-11 , 19:34
Moderator | Posts: 7,109 | Thanked: 8,820 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Vancouver, BC, Canada
#18
I guess I should have put my complaints over here instead of over there. This would be a better place to discuss it.
__________________
qole.org --- twitter --- Easy Debian wiki page
Please don't send me a private message, post to the appropriate thread.
Thank you all for your donations!
 
qole's Avatar
qole is offline qole
2010-03-11 , 20:01
Moderator | Posts: 7,109 | Thanked: 8,820 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Vancouver, BC, Canada
#19
Ok, I think there's a bug here, which is quite ironic. I'm still getting reports that my bugtracker link is broken, and I think it is because the packages interface is pulling that field semi-randomly from various versions of the package, depending on factors I have yet to fathom.

For instance, earlier this morning the package overview page was showing the old broken bugtracker field, and now it is showing the correct one.

...And I just did a refresh of that page, and it is showing the broken link again!

ARGH.

EDIT: It is doing the same thing on the package instance page, too. Randomly pulling the description and bugtracker fields (but not changelog, interestingly) from old versions of the package, or the current version, depending on the whims of The Machine.
__________________
qole.org --- twitter --- Easy Debian wiki page
Please don't send me a private message, post to the appropriate thread.
Thank you all for your donations!
Last edited by qole; 2010-03-11 at 20:12.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to qole For This Useful Post:
benny1967's Avatar
benny1967 is offline benny1967
2010-03-11 , 21:05
Posts: 3,790 | Thanked: 5,718 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ Vienna, Austria
#20
The Moblin bugzilla (and maybe others) has an interesting feature: It has a "file new bug for <product>" link at the end of a page when you search for bugs in <product>. If a developer wants to make sure that users actually read existing bugs reports before filing new ones, linking directly to the query (=the search results) in the bugtracker field wouldn't, IMHO, not only be acceptable, but even better than directly linking to the "enter new bug" form.

what's your opinion?

(I think there's no such "enter new bug"-link in the search results on bugs.maemo.org)
 

The Following User Says Thank You to benny1967 For This Useful Post:
Reply
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:04.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top