![]() |
2010-04-04
, 20:57
|
|
Posts: 682 |
Thanked: 208 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ UK
|
#712
|
btw i have question
This test is highly influenced by the characteristics of the Internet connection, or am I wrong?
![]() |
2010-04-04
, 20:58
|
Posts: 126 |
Thanked: 327 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Finland
|
#713
|
![]() |
2010-04-04
, 20:58
|
Posts: 147 |
Thanked: 44 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ England
|
#714
|
![]() |
2010-04-04
, 21:00
|
Posts: 151 |
Thanked: 82 times |
Joined on Sep 2008
|
#715
|
If you guys want to benchmark the browser after you've overclocked, i'd suggest you run this benchmark in full screen
http://www2.webkit.org/perf/sunspide...sunspider.html
I know it's a webkit benchmark, but it should be a pretty good measure when comparing different clock speeds.
If you run the benchmark, make sure to note your score (should be the Total up top) and any overclocks you've done.
For me: 37233.6ms @ 600mhz (stock)
The Following User Says Thank You to fixfox For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-04-04
, 21:01
|
|
Posts: 118 |
Thanked: 67 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Saint Louis, MO, USA
|
#716
|
![]() |
2010-04-04
, 21:03
|
Posts: 543 |
Thanked: 151 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Germany
|
#717
|
![]() |
2010-04-04
, 21:04
|
Posts: 102 |
Thanked: 7 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#718
|
![]() |
2010-04-04
, 21:04
|
Posts: 151 |
Thanked: 82 times |
Joined on Sep 2008
|
#719
|
![]() |
2010-04-04
, 21:06
|
|
Posts: 129 |
Thanked: 321 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Finland (Turku)
|
#720
|
I believe I am the Champion :: 13237.4ms @ 800Mhz +/- 8.0%
Fennec Nightly build (4th April 2010)
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
N900 @600 Firefox: 16488.6ms
iPhone 3GS Safari: 17360 ms*
Nexus One 14409 ms*
iPad: 10475 ms*
* Source: anandtech.com
It seems that the Firefox javascript engine (Tracemonkey) is a lot better than the one in MicroB, so how about running the test on Firefox @900MHz?