nokian-series is offline nokian-series
2010-04-12 , 13:38
Posts: 169 | Thanked: 41 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Portugal
#41
To activate SmartReflex, is needed to activate this two?
sr_vdd1_autocomp 1
sr_vdd2_autocomp 1

What are they?
One of it not enought?

Just trying to get some awnsers quickly.
(And yes, i know this can not work on some phones)
 
thelushlife is offline thelushlife
2010-04-12 , 14:39
Posts: 86 | Thanked: 52 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#42
yep you need to activate both from 0 to 1 to activate smartreflex.

i used to activate smartreflex, until i found out about the awesome ultra low voltage kernels of lehto and titan, after flashing you get BETTER battery life and faster speed!

i recommend smartreflex users try it! faster than smartreflex, more battery life than smartreflex
 
zimon is offline zimon
2010-04-12 , 15:18
Posts: 1,341 | Thanked: 708 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#43
What if SmartReflex and UC+OC-kernels (125 Mhz - 900 Mhz) are used at the same time? Any problems?

And would think both vddr1 and vddr2 means different things, so activating only one may do something already?
(Nope, have not read this http://focus.ti.com/pdfs/wtbu/smartr...whitepaper.pdf)
 
nokian-series is offline nokian-series
2010-04-12 , 15:24
Posts: 169 | Thanked: 41 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Portugal
#44
I'm using 125 Mhz - 900 Mhz kernel, tried active smartreflex, no sucess, phone hangs up during boot.
 
mooninite is offline mooninite
2010-04-12 , 15:25
Posts: 176 | Thanked: 262 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Texas, USA
#45
Originally Posted by thelushlife View Post
yep you need to activate both from 0 to 1 to activate smartreflex.

i used to activate smartreflex, until i found out about the awesome ultra low voltage kernels of lehto and titan, after flashing you get BETTER battery life and faster speed!

i recommend smartreflex users try it! faster than smartreflex, more battery life than smartreflex
I'm sorry but that isn't true. Unless you have hard benchmark numbers, SmartReflex will win every time.
 
Rob1n is offline Rob1n
2010-04-12 , 15:38
Posts: 3,617 | Thanked: 2,412 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Cambridge, UK
#46
Originally Posted by mooninite View Post
I'm sorry but that isn't true. Unless you have hard benchmark numbers, SmartReflex will win every time.
Do you have hard benchmark numbers? Otherwise it's all just speculation either way. I'd be inclined to suspect SmartReflex as being the safer low power option, but I don't have any concrete info either way.
 
miwalter is offline miwalter
2010-04-13 , 10:14
Posts: 36 | Thanked: 8 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#47
Enabling SmartReflex on my phone and the displays stops working (ssh-remote-access _does_ work however) and the phone seems unstable and unpretictable.

I think there are enough reasons not to enable it by default at the current kernel (if the kernel has something to do with theses symptom(s)).
 
TheThane is offline TheThane
2010-04-13 , 12:44
Posts: 42 | Thanked: 7 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#48
OC-kernels + SmartReflex phone not boot :X
 
mooninite is offline mooninite
2010-04-13 , 16:23
Posts: 176 | Thanked: 262 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Texas, USA
#49
Originally Posted by Rob1n View Post
Do you have hard benchmark numbers? Otherwise it's all just speculation either way. I'd be inclined to suspect SmartReflex as being the safer low power option, but I don't have any concrete info either way.
The TI documentation for Smart Reflex gives you all the information you need. I don't see a reason to duplicate its efforts.
 
Rob1n is offline Rob1n
2010-04-13 , 17:48
Posts: 3,617 | Thanked: 2,412 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Cambridge, UK
#50
Originally Posted by mooninite View Post
The TI documentation for Smart Reflex gives you all the information you need. I don't see a reason to duplicate its efforts.
No it doesn't. There's absolutely zero benchmarks or comparative figures in there.
 
Reply
Page 5 of 6 « First 34 5 6

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:54.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top