Active Topics
-
Maemo repository (9)
to Community by nokiafemboy - 7 hrs, 35 mins ago -
Error after installing Leste on sdcard (18)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by Maemish - 22 hrs, 59 mins ago -
Maemo 20th Anniversary (4)
to Brainstorm by teroyk - 2 days, 18 hrs ago -
Nokia Booklet 3G (RX-75) Drivers (64)
to Alternatives by teroyk - 2 days, 18 hrs ago -
Porting apps to Leste (46)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by teroyk - 4 days, 21 hrs ago - more...
|
2010-04-22
, 06:01
|
|
Posts: 74 |
Thanked: 15 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#152
|
1.
If the area where the train track switches is a open field(if I can see the group of 5 and the1 person I should be able to see this as well) I'd pull the switch halfway to derail the train. after all the train isn't said to be a passenger train and the conductor and crew would half a higher chance of living then the people tied to the tracks.
2.
I'd go untie the people
3.
I'd go untie the people
If the area where the train track switches is a open field(if I can see the group of 5 and the1 person I should be able to see this as well) I'd pull the switch halfway to derail the train. after all the train isn't said to be a passenger train and the conductor and crew would half a higher chance of living then the people tied to the tracks.
2.
I'd go untie the people
3.
I'd go untie the people
__________________
On a whole despite some cool people, this by far is the worst community I've ever come across.
R.I.P. Maemo 5
11/16/2009 - 06/04/2010
On a whole despite some cool people, this by far is the worst community I've ever come across.
R.I.P. Maemo 5
11/16/2009 - 06/04/2010
|
|
2010-04-22
, 06:30
|
|
Posts: 74 |
Thanked: 15 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#153
|
Originally Posted by gobuki
i would unplug the box then let everyone out
No, that complicates the situation. I wouldn't kill anybody actively other than in self defense.
The first situation is relatively simple so you can give a short answer based on math.
But most real situations aren't that simple, so you know something about what happened before and who are the people and else.
I believe most people would apply math if they are forced to give a quick answer on the street. But they are totally disconnected from the situation. This being easily exploitable by warmongers makes it a good choice as propaganda material.
@ysss: A slight variation. There is a blackbox with 6 people in it. And it has a knob that let's you choose how many people it kills. It has two settings, 1 and 6 and it's set to 6. Do you change it to 1?
__________________
On a whole despite some cool people, this by far is the worst community I've ever come across.
R.I.P. Maemo 5
11/16/2009 - 06/04/2010
On a whole despite some cool people, this by far is the worst community I've ever come across.
R.I.P. Maemo 5
11/16/2009 - 06/04/2010
|
|
2010-04-22
, 06:44
|
|
Posts: 74 |
Thanked: 15 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#154
|
Originally Posted by fatalsaint
I would check his id first to see if he's a donor, if so I'd tell him the situation and ask him if he wanted me to save him or the people. If he's not a donor then I'd operate on him.
I would consider this one to be a closer analogy:
You're a doctor and you have a dying patient. This patient is dying from something operable but totally unrelated to his organs (at least, the ones needed below). The surgery for this is extremely difficult and time consuming.
5 others come in from a bus wreck or whatever. All of them require a different organ, and by the light of god, the original dying patient is a matching donor for all other patients.
The 5 other patients surgeries are easier, higher chance of success, and you can do all 5 surgeries before they die.
The original patient's surgery is complicated, takes many hours, and by the time you were done doing that surgery all the other patients would be dead.
You are the only doctor within a time-allowable distance to perform any of the 6 different surgeries.
What do you do? Let the original patient die for the organs - after all, you didn't poison him or make him sick? Or save the original patient and let the 5 die while you're in surgery?
This one is harder to answer, but seems a better analogy to the train tracks than having a healthy sleeping patient.
__________________
On a whole despite some cool people, this by far is the worst community I've ever come across.
R.I.P. Maemo 5
11/16/2009 - 06/04/2010
On a whole despite some cool people, this by far is the worst community I've ever come across.
R.I.P. Maemo 5
11/16/2009 - 06/04/2010
 |
|
2010-04-22
, 10:02
|
|
Posts: 2,050 |
Thanked: 1,425 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Bucharest
|
#155
|
Originally Posted by Dak
a) i see zero religion. Power being granted onto one is realistic and legal. Looking at and issue from one angle only and dismissing it as bogus is the best and fastest way to ignore an issue.
"By the unlucky nature of you being at that spot at that time the power is granted to you to change the scenario, whether you want it or not"
Religious hocus pocus.
You remain an innocent bystander.
b) By your measure of an innocent bystander, if I work at a hole in the street and you see a preoccupied driver flooring it towards me you will say nothing, since you are an innocent bystander. You are legally and morallly obligated to yell or push in any way you can, short of endangering yourself.
Innocent bystanding is for people who were there and could do nothing, like in a drive-by. If you could do something and you didn't just because, you might and should be responslible.
Standard N900 post appoligies.
__________________
N900 dead and Nokia no longer replaces them. Thanks for all the fish.
Keep the forums clean: use "Thanks" button instead of the thank you post.
N900 dead and Nokia no longer replaces them. Thanks for all the fish.
Keep the forums clean: use "Thanks" button instead of the thank you post.
|
|
2010-04-22
, 10:05
|
|
Posts: 2,050 |
Thanked: 1,425 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Bucharest
|
#156
|
Originally Posted by Slick
If he agrees there's no moral dilemma. You might be legally responsible for assisted suicide.
I would check his id first to see if he's a donor, if so I'd tell him the situation and ask him if he wanted me to save him or the people. If he's not a donor then I'd operate on him.
__________________
N900 dead and Nokia no longer replaces them. Thanks for all the fish.
Keep the forums clean: use "Thanks" button instead of the thank you post.
N900 dead and Nokia no longer replaces them. Thanks for all the fish.
Keep the forums clean: use "Thanks" button instead of the thank you post.
|
|
2010-04-22
, 10:44
|
|
Posts: 889 |
Thanked: 537 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ scotland
|
#157
|
i had written an extremely long, drawn out and detailed reply, (which was perfect, infallible, and it would work...) but pressed previous thread with my fat thumbs, (... but the earth was destroyed before she could get to a telephone and tell anyone.) i cant be bothered typing it all again so heres the bullet points-
1. why is everyone suddenly debating the legality? in this situation the legal consequences wouldn't even come to my mind, save the five, any procurator with common sense wouldn't even take it o court anyway.
2. the opinion of my peers however would bother me (no i'm not tagging my torrents with "i let 5 people die to save 1") i couldn't tell my family i walked away and let the 5 die for the sake of killing 1. i couldn't expect my friends to respect me if i told them i'd done that.
3. walking away and absolving yourself of any moral responsibility on the grounds that "well i didn't do anything" to me shows an inhuman detachment bordering on psychotic :P
4. the doctor and military commander analogies aren't as relevant. their professional ethics will have been conditioned. a doctor takes a vow to do no harm and should stick to it. a military commander can kill 600 people from 100 miles away who were completely uinaware before breakfast, and sit down to his cornflakes thinking its a good start to the day.
1. why is everyone suddenly debating the legality? in this situation the legal consequences wouldn't even come to my mind, save the five, any procurator with common sense wouldn't even take it o court anyway.
2. the opinion of my peers however would bother me (no i'm not tagging my torrents with "i let 5 people die to save 1") i couldn't tell my family i walked away and let the 5 die for the sake of killing 1. i couldn't expect my friends to respect me if i told them i'd done that.
3. walking away and absolving yourself of any moral responsibility on the grounds that "well i didn't do anything" to me shows an inhuman detachment bordering on psychotic :P
4. the doctor and military commander analogies aren't as relevant. their professional ethics will have been conditioned. a doctor takes a vow to do no harm and should stick to it. a military commander can kill 600 people from 100 miles away who were completely uinaware before breakfast, and sit down to his cornflakes thinking its a good start to the day.
__________________
sarcasm may be the lowest form of wit, but its the only wit i have.
its a sad day when i can't slip at least one hitchhiker reference in somewhere.
sarcasm may be the lowest form of wit, but its the only wit i have.
its a sad day when i can't slip at least one hitchhiker reference in somewhere.
|
|
2010-04-22
, 14:25
|
|
Posts: 3,428 |
Thanked: 2,856 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#158
|
Originally Posted by Dak
I actually would claim the opposite.
5 is not necessarily greater than 1.
To think otherwise is a brutal affront to humanity - to suggest that an individual life is only worthy until the mob decides differently.
Those that toy with meting death to others may find it inspiring to consider their ideological bedfellows.....
To say that 1 life is worth 5 is a brutal affront to humanity. Life should be equal.
As I said previously, no one life is any more or less than any one other life - even if you compare a sociopath to a scientist or great historical figure. They are both still equal.
The instant you have more than 1 life at risk for 1 life; the logical solution is to save as many as possible greater than 1.
Logic of course plays no part if you happen know any of the people; because there is no getting around the human factor that your family or friends are going to hold a higher value to you than random strangers. However, that still doesn't make the decision to save your wife and letting hundreds die (as an example) - the right decision. It does, though, make it an understandable one.
It would not be understandable to me if you were somehow in the position to save a hundred lives from a bomb or something else at great risk to a single someone else; and you just walked away deciding "not your business" because you didn't know anybody.. why should you care?
However, I wouldn't agree with anyone trying to say that you had a legal requirement to do anything.. I just personally think you should have a moral obligation too. *shrug*
 |
|
2010-04-22
, 14:32
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#159
|
It's easy to indulge options in a forum discussion, but odds are in real life a person faced with these immediate choices would suffer analysis paralysis.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
|
|
2010-04-22
, 14:33
|
|
Posts: 3,428 |
Thanked: 2,856 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#160
|
Originally Posted by Texrat
This is possible. Especially someone that has never faced life or death situations before.
It's easy to indulge options in a forum discussion, but odds are in real life a person faced with these immediate choices would suffer analysis paralysis.
ETA: Also, one thing you learn about situations like this is the more you talk about it and think about possibilities of situations you are to be and decide before-hand your stance.. the easier it is to make a decision in those situations. So these kinds of debates *are* actually useful.
 |
| Tags |
| maemo, morality, philosophy |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:34.
To think otherwise is a brutal affront to humanity - to suggest that an individual life is only worthy until the mob decides differently.
Those that toy with meting death to others may find it inspiring to consider their ideological bedfellows.....
Last edited by Dak; 2010-04-22 at 05:53.