![]() |
2010-05-07
, 19:04
|
Posts: 119 |
Thanked: 124 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Brazil
|
#171
|
![]() |
2010-05-07
, 19:25
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#172
|
![]() |
2010-05-07
, 19:33
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#173
|
![]() |
2010-05-07
, 19:35
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#174
|
![]() |
2010-05-07
, 19:47
|
Posts: 619 |
Thanked: 100 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#176
|
![]() |
2010-05-07
, 20:36
|
Posts: 968 |
Thanked: 974 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
@ Ohio
|
#177
|
Problem with your assumption is that in the maemo.org bugtracker there are at least two comments where a Nokia employee uses the term "PR 1.3".
The Following User Says Thank You to lemmyslender For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-05-07
, 20:57
|
Posts: 249 |
Thanked: 167 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ International
|
#178
|
![]() |
2010-05-07
, 22:29
|
|
Posts: 2,869 |
Thanked: 1,784 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Po' Bo'. PA
|
#179
|
... also, there's this recent statement about PR1.2 using a new rootfs layout to have more space on rootfs available for SSUs. I wonder how much sense it would make to put effort into that and then not providing at least one more SSU.
I don't know why I even care much about PR1.2. By far the biggest thing that has happened to my N900 has been overclocking. It's hard for me to believe that PR1.2 will top that....
Name: RX-51_2009SE_10.2010.12-9_PR_COMBINED_MR0_ARM.bin Date Modified: 3/31/2010 11:31 AM Type: BIN file Size: 182,745 KB
The Following User Says Thank You to YoDude For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-05-07
, 23:47
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#180
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Laughing Man For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
Tags |
poo poo 1.2, pr 1.2, why am i here? |
Thread Tools | |
|