Active Topics
-
[HOWTO] Comprehensive Firmware Flashing Guide for N9 (1,580)
to Nokia N9 / N950 by aspergerguy - 11 hrs, 43 mins ago -
Nokia N9-00 Prototype Build S1.12 (RM-680 codename "Dali") (250)
to Nokia N9 / N950 by en0s - 3 days, 8 hrs ago -
[Announce] Maebble - Pebble support for Maemo (118)
to Applications by glo-worm - 3 days, 20 hrs ago -
Possible to flash Leste to eMMC? (6)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by Eri - 4 days, 10 hrs ago - more...
Icyseanfitz |
2010-05-16
, 18:34
|
|
Posts: 113 |
Thanked: 8 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#81
|
why did the staurn rocket program get dropped if it could leave low earth orbit wouldnt it have made sense to try and keep that going?? probably cost again 
 |
|
2010-05-16
, 18:35
|
|
Posts: 3,159 |
Thanked: 2,023 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Finland
|
#82
|
Originally Posted by Dollyknot
did he really?
Or Bill Gates who said "640K of memory should be enough for anybody."
spoiler: not.
__________________
Want to know something?
K.I.S.S. approach:
wiki category:beginners. Browse it through and you'll be much wiser!
If the link doesn't help, just use
Google Custom Search
Want to know something?
K.I.S.S. approach:
wiki category:beginners. Browse it through and you'll be much wiser!
If the link doesn't help, just use
Google Custom Search
|
|
2010-05-16
, 18:38
|
|
Posts: 92 |
Thanked: 13 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ leicester UK
|
#83
|
The big difference between us and other animals, is other animals very much in the main, are adapted the environment.
We take the environment and adapt it to us, so it could be said we have evolved the ability to adapt the environment to us, which is why we are despeciating the planet by evolving it to our needs.
If we take life to the moon and beyond, how will we be ruining these at the present, totally lifeless environments, unless of course you think life itself a pollution?
We take the environment and adapt it to us, so it could be said we have evolved the ability to adapt the environment to us, which is why we are despeciating the planet by evolving it to our needs.
If we take life to the moon and beyond, how will we be ruining these at the present, totally lifeless environments, unless of course you think life itself a pollution?
|
|
2010-05-16
, 18:46
|
|
Posts: 215 |
Thanked: 159 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#84
|
Originally Posted by Icyseanfitz
Because we went to the moon before we really knew what we were doing. We took huge risks and spent big bucks to beat the russians and it was partly due to dumb luck that we never had a disaster on the moon. Sooner or later we would have.
why did the staurn rocket program get dropped if it could leave low earth orbit wouldnt it have made sense to try and keep that going?? probably cost again
Once we beat the russians, LEO was seen as an affordable place to learn how to live in space for extended periods of time so that when we did go back to the moon, we could stay there.
|
|
2010-05-16
, 18:58
|
|
Posts: 92 |
Thanked: 13 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ leicester UK
|
#85
|
Originally Posted by ossipena
Not verbatim no, what he actually said was "I have to say that in 1981, making those decisions, I felt like I was providing enough freedom for 10 years. That is, a move from 64k to 640k felt like something that would last a great deal of time."
did he really?
spoiler: not.
From http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Bill_Gates
|
|
2010-05-16
, 19:04
|
|
Posts: 215 |
Thanked: 159 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#86
|
Until recently the U.S. and Russia were the only two countries that could put men in space. In the last few years, China has launched their first few manned space flights - and they have lunar ambitions.
I really hope China secretly develops a huge lunar program. Because the reaction from the U.S. would be the same as it was in the 60's - spend huge amounts of money to one-up them!
I really hope China secretly develops a huge lunar program. Because the reaction from the U.S. would be the same as it was in the 60's - spend huge amounts of money to one-up them!
|
|
2010-05-16
, 19:09
|
|
Posts: 376 |
Thanked: 56 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#87
|
I reckon Steve Jobs will be the first to Mars with his iPhone 5.0 OS 
Seriously though I hope they do find alternate ways of getting into Space, the elevator does look like a good concept
Seriously though I hope they do find alternate ways of getting into Space, the elevator does look like a good concept
|
|
2010-05-16
, 19:12
|
|
Posts: 113 |
Thanked: 8 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#88
|
the thing is china are probably the only country out their right now that can afford big space programs and in all likelihood they are creating a massive space program we just dont know about it lunar hell i hope they have ambitions for mars as well 
|
|
2010-05-16
, 19:13
|
|
Posts: 92 |
Thanked: 13 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ leicester UK
|
#89
|
Originally Posted by Flynx
Yeah the big draw is helium 3.
Until recently the U.S. and Russia were the only two countries that could put men in space. In the last few years, China has launched their first few manned space flights - and they have lunar ambitions.
I really hope China secretly develops a huge lunar program. Because the reaction from the U.S. would be the same as it was in the 60's - spend huge amounts of money to one-up them!
Personally I would like to see the UN do it, but that is just a silly dream.
May I remind you, the true cost is work, money never fed anybody, farmers feed most of us.
All money does is motivates people, the problem is, some people want to make money without doing anything for it.
Last edited by Dollyknot; 2010-05-16 at 19:30.
|
|
2010-05-16
, 19:31
|
|
Posts: 215 |
Thanked: 159 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#90
|
Originally Posted by Dollyknot
Not so silly. The international space station is a cooperation between the United States, Russia, Canada, Japan, Italy, Germany, France... lots of countries.
Personally I would like to see the UN do it, but that is just a silly dream.
American, Russian, European, and Japanese vehicles launch and dock to the space station.
