Active Topics
-
[HOWTO] Comprehensive Firmware Flashing Guide for N9 (1,580)
to Nokia N9 / N950 by aspergerguy - 11 hrs, 47 mins ago -
Nokia N9-00 Prototype Build S1.12 (RM-680 codename "Dali") (250)
to Nokia N9 / N950 by en0s - 3 days, 8 hrs ago -
[Announce] Maebble - Pebble support for Maemo (118)
to Applications by glo-worm - 3 days, 20 hrs ago -
Possible to flash Leste to eMMC? (6)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by Eri - 4 days, 10 hrs ago - more...
|
2010-05-16
, 19:51
|
|
Posts: 249 |
Thanked: 167 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ International
|
#92
|
Originally Posted by xomm
functionality over form perhaps?
That website of your's, dollyknot, by the way, is aesthetically painful. >.<
I have been rootling around in it for the past 3 days and it is a little treasure trove of unusual delights.
so on this one... +1 for dollyknots aesthetically painful website
__________________
How to ask questions the smart way
He who smiles in a crisis has found someone to blame.
Shirts get dirty. Underwear gets dirty. Pants? Pants never get dirty, and you can wear them forever.
My Favourite posts!
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...&postcount=539
http://forums.precentral.net/2674180-post149.html
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...&postcount=500
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=63720
How to ask questions the smart way
He who smiles in a crisis has found someone to blame.
Shirts get dirty. Underwear gets dirty. Pants? Pants never get dirty, and you can wear them forever.
My Favourite posts!
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...&postcount=539
http://forums.precentral.net/2674180-post149.html
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...&postcount=500
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=63720
|
|
2010-05-16
, 20:23
|
|
Posts: 92 |
Thanked: 13 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ leicester UK
|
#93
|
Originally Posted by gryedouge
Thx
functionality over form perhaps?
I have been rootling around in it for the past 3 days and it is a little treasure trove of unusual delights.
so on this one... +1 for dollyknots aesthetically painful website
The Chinese used to cripple their women by crushing their feet 'coz they thought women with smaller feet looked sexier.
Aesthetics is a minefield, but the sad thing is at the moment, in the main it seems to run human affairs, in as much as - if it looks all right, it is all right, never mind the quality, feel the width.
Last edited by Dollyknot; 2010-05-16 at 23:18.
|
|
2010-05-16
, 20:41
|
|
Posts: 376 |
Thanked: 56 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#94
|
Originally Posted by Flynx
It does have lots of problems
I like the idea, but it has problems. Like what happens if a plane crashes into it (accidentally or intentionally)?
like what happens if the tether snaps, its not just the people in / on the elevator that would perish, but how much damage would be caused by the whiplash of the tethers
What if it gets stuck (at the top or half way)
In principle it does seem a logical solution though, once you get your head round the concept that it may actually work
|
|
2010-05-16
, 21:06
|
|
Posts: 113 |
Thanked: 8 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#95
|
you would have to make sure that it has multiple tethers i suppose and that each are constructed out of an extremely durable material to be honest its benefits far outweigh its negatives, also we cannot let terrorists dictate what we do or dont do for that is exactly what they want
|
|
2010-05-16
, 21:12
|
|
Posts: 92 |
Thanked: 13 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ leicester UK
|
#96
|
Originally Posted by *Sonic*
I hope you realize this proposed elevator would have to be 35,786 km long to work.
It does have lots of problems
like what happens if the tether snaps, its not just the people in / on the elevator that would perish, but how much damage would be caused by the whiplash of the tethers
What if it gets stuck (at the top or half way)
In principle it does seem a logical solution though, once you get your head round the concept that it may actually work
Use the rocket fuel on the moon to open the door, far simpler.
|
|
2010-05-16
, 21:32
|
|
Posts: 889 |
Thanked: 537 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ scotland
|
#97
|
no the elevatoe only needs to leave the earths gravitational pull, to some orbital station type thingamybob. then launch from there uses... (does some quick maths using the formulae posted earlier) ...a lot less fuel!
__________________
sarcasm may be the lowest form of wit, but its the only wit i have.
its a sad day when i can't slip at least one hitchhiker reference in somewhere.
sarcasm may be the lowest form of wit, but its the only wit i have.
its a sad day when i can't slip at least one hitchhiker reference in somewhere.
|
|
2010-05-16
, 22:16
|
|
Posts: 215 |
Thanked: 159 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#98
|
Originally Posted by Dollyknot
It would have to be longer than that because you would need a counter-balance extending farther into space.
I hope you realize this proposed elevator would have to be 35,786 km long to work.
|
|
2010-05-16
, 23:03
|
|
Posts: 92 |
Thanked: 13 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ leicester UK
|
#99
|
Originally Posted by Flynx
Erm 35,786 km is geostationary orbit, perhaps we have a different understanding of Newtonian celestial mechanics, your statement to wit -
It would have to be longer than that because you would need a counter-balance extending farther into space.
" Well, mass cancelled out in the equations. So the mass of the vehicle doesn't matter. However much energy it takes to get to orbit, it will take 90% of that energy to slow back down."
Your understanding of mass seems to differ from mine, in terms of the economics of the equation.
To my limited understanding, the more mass you have, the greater the cost to get it to orbit, sort of dollar * Kg, if part of the mass exists up there already, you need less fuel, to get less fuel up there already.
To understand recursion, first you must understand recursion, lol.
Last edited by Dollyknot; 2010-05-17 at 00:06.
|
|
2010-05-17
, 00:26
|
|
Posts: 92 |
Thanked: 13 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ leicester UK
|
#100
|
Originally Posted by Dollyknot
Yes and I agree with myself
Mm when the whole stack is ready to rumble it weighs 2,000,000 kg, the idea of getting all that weight off the ground boggles the mind.
Space ship one fully laden, weighs 3,600 kg.
So how much moon mined delta v would it take to accelerate SS1to escape velocity?
Obviously the moon tug will have to have expend some fuel, getting from the moon to earth orbit and slowing down to the speed of SS1 which would be 3,518 km/h, then accelerate the whole kit and caboodle, back up up to orbital velocity and beyond?
I like the idea, but it has problems. Like what happens if a plane crashes into it (accidentally or intentionally)?