Reply
Thread Tools
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#111
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
I don't think Quim is going to do that. But sure, it would be nice if Nokia was confident enough in the company's abilities that full sales disclosures were the norm...
Apparently asking for direct answers from Nokia about sales, whether or not something will be supported in the future is met with silence from them.

And being called a troll by the community. That's an odd position to put somebody that's used to open communication.

The former, discouraging. The latter, ignorable.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post:
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#112
Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
Apparently asking for direct answers from Nokia about sales, whether or not something will be supported in the future is met with silence from them.

And being called a troll by the community. That's an odd position to put somebody that's used to open communication.

The former, discouraging. The latter, ignorable.
I'm confused. Did your response stem from something *I* said???
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 
Posts: 145 | Thanked: 80 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#113
Red flags popped up as soon as I saw "Gartner." They have an anti-Linux bias
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cyeung For This Useful Post:
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#114
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
I'm confused. Did your response stem from something *I* said???
Ignore that you got quoted.
 
Posts: 362 | Thanked: 143 times | Joined on Mar 2008
#115
Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
Apparently asking for direct answers from Nokia about sales, whether or not something will be supported in the future is met with silence from them.

And being called a troll by the community. That's an odd position to put somebody that's used to open communication.

The former, discouraging. The latter, ignorable.
I would agree that you have a fair question. # of download would only give you so much info; but not the real deal:-).

On the other hand, it is upto Nokia to decide whether they want the whole world to know the exact # or not. Some folks here may be associated with the 'mothership'; but if the big guy upstair does not want to make the info public, then folks here can't give out the info here(it would be unprofessional and unethical). I, for one, would like to deal with people who are ethical and all.

Cheers
 
Posts: 1,667 | Thanked: 561 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#116
Originally Posted by olighak View Post
He didn´t try to prove that. He talked about extras downloads, which you cannot correlate, at least not if you wan´t to talk up how many devices are out there.

Case in point:
I´ve got 3 N900´s here that I look after.

Mine accounts for roughly 500 downloads by itself (4 reflashes * 80 apps that need to be downloaded + running updates). My wife´s accounts for probably around 100-150 downloads. My fathers accounts for probably around 100-150 downloads.

So lets say it´s 750 total for 3 devices, or 250 per device. There have been 10 million downloads from Maemo.org repositories. These count all updates as well as fresh downloads.

Using these numbers, dividing downloads per device into the number of downloads, we end up with 40.000 devices for 250dl´s/device. If we use the number 150 downloads per device we end up at 66667 devices. If we use 100 downloads per device we end up at 100.000 devices.

So taking a swag, I´d say the number is probably not in any chance over 200.000. Most likely below 150.000.
Then maybe I'm mistaken but do the numbers include every update and download after flashing?
 
Posts: 72 | Thanked: 21 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#117
Originally Posted by pantera1989 View Post
Not really madness. Nokia never pushed the N900. No ads no nothing. The N900 was an experiment if you will. It was never intended as a flagship product. The N97 was.
what are you talking about?

Nokia had HUGE advertising everywhere for the N900 - every airport I went to for 2 months had Nokia N900 banners plastered all over.

Plenty of adverts - even in Financial Times (I have a scan if you want a copy)

So no ads? and no nothing? nope not at all - plenty of advertising everywhere.....
 
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#118
Originally Posted by kaz911 View Post
what are you talking about?

Nokia had HUGE advertising everywhere for the N900 - every airport I went to for 2 months had Nokia N900 banners plastered all over.

Plenty of adverts - even in Financial Times (I have a scan if you want a copy)

So no ads? and no nothing? nope not at all - plenty of advertising everywhere.....
The ads were not really visible in North America and Japan. But Europe having ads would make more sense though.

Am I wrong to assume you're speaking of advertisements in Europe? We saw little to none in the US, Mexico and Canada markets.
 
Posts: 62 | Thanked: 6 times | Joined on May 2010
#119
Ads were non-existent in my part of the States.
I've still never seen an ad for the N900 on the street, on TV or even online.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to olrac For This Useful Post:
ZogG's Avatar
Posts: 1,389 | Thanked: 1,857 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Israel
#120
I don't know about ads before, but when it came to Honk-Kong it was huge ad
 
Reply

Tags
nokia n900, sales

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:31.