The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to jmbowman For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-05-28
, 22:54
|
Posts: 75 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Verona, Italy
|
#42
|
![]() |
2010-05-28
, 22:59
|
Banned |
Posts: 138 |
Thanked: 45 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#43
|
![]() |
2010-05-29
, 00:04
|
Posts: 362 |
Thanked: 143 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
|
#44
|
![]() |
2010-05-29
, 00:07
|
Posts: 1,746 |
Thanked: 2,100 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#45
|
![]() |
2010-05-29
, 16:50
|
Posts: 15 |
Thanked: 6 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#46
|
If you have a brain, you know applications don't grow on trees or suddenly show up over night...
![]() |
2010-06-16
, 02:19
|
Posts: 247 |
Thanked: 37 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Los Angeles
|
#47
|
![]() |
Tags |
just another, loser thread |
Thread Tools | |
|
Some thoughts on the process of making an existing Qt app available for the N900:
As a side note, porting apps from other platforms is hardly the only benefit to having Qt on the N900. The Qt framework is extremely capable, very well documented, and as often as possible "does the right thing" without you needing to manually fiddle with stuff. My personal experience has been that Qt apps tend to hit "mostly stable and feature-complete" a lot faster than GTK+ apps. So hopefully we'll start seeing apps with somewhat faster development cycles (although expecting results in the first few days is pretty unrealistic).