The Following User Says Thank You to ndi For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-06-13
, 17:08
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#212
|
Knowing that you can vote someone off the forum, bad English isn't the main point up for evaluation. In my experience, behaviour is evaluated and this is all in line with Texrat's view on things (unless I've totally misunderstood something).
The Following User Says Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-06-13
, 17:18
|
Posts: 726 |
Thanked: 345 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Sweden
|
#213
|
And yes you and I are in alignment on addressing behavior BUT do note I'm a minor moderator here and that ultimately Reggie has been setting the tone.
![]() |
2010-06-13
, 17:20
|
|
Posts: 2,050 |
Thanked: 1,425 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Bucharest
|
#214
|
And I still think that a vote system that enables all users to help with keeping the forum clean is the best way to solve this.
You raised a point about people that are bad communicators or bad at English might get an unfair treatment with this system and I understand your point but I don't agree on it. Looking at the threads I've stumbled over in my short time here, bad English is pretty common but not something that stops people from helping or trying to ask questions to understand.
Knowing that you can vote someone off the forum, bad English isn't the main point up for evaluation. In my experience, behaviour is evaluated and this is all in line with Texrat's view on things (unless I've totally misunderstood something).
Trying to move threads to "out of sight" places is to treat the symptom and not the problem.
![]() |
2010-06-13
, 17:55
|
Posts: 726 |
Thanked: 345 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Sweden
|
#215
|
That's why I like it when I see locations in people's posts. It amplifies my doltometer. Still, this moves my opinion of the user and his/her values, not those of the content, so in the end, it does little above being a nuisance.
Finally, we try to cure the symptom because the cure for the cause is part jail and part execution and that sort of smells of failed management. Not that I'd cry to see some people not come back, but final decisions need a lot more effort. Plus, there's the people I hate more than the trollers, the raiders.
Oh dear, you got me started again.
![]() |
2010-06-13
, 21:38
|
Posts: 15 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#216
|
![]() |
2010-06-13
, 22:20
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#217
|
That includes adding a rants and raves section for both trolls AS WELL AS fanboys. Of course, this means that moderators would have to allow anger and disappointment threads, which, they have been unwilling to do.
![]() |
2010-06-13
, 22:26
|
|
Posts: 3,096 |
Thanked: 1,525 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Michigan, USA
|
#218
|
You're generalizing.
I sure don't mind a section devoted to venting. Granted it only addresses the surface of the issues, but many times that's all some people are after anyway.
So yeah, if we had such a "quarantined" section I'd have no problem with allowing those threads there. But I get the idea Reggie disagrees.
|
2010-06-13
, 23:07
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#219
|
![]() |
2010-06-14
, 00:54
|
Posts: 278 |
Thanked: 209 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#220
|
![]() |
Tags |
community, we the people |
Thread Tools | |
|
However, a ease-in system, like karma in some forums, kudos, etc, doesn't generate loads of pressure in return, especially if those karma points are precious and the warnings are temporary.
I like the thanks system this far, but what limits it is
(one) it doesn't have a reverse, so it just goes up if you insist,
(two) it stays, if nobody moves the thread to off-topic, so the flame wars are quite the place to get inter-troll thanks,
(three) it's free, and free stuff gets thrown around and finally
(four) some people are way, way above others, for example an announce software post/thread, a piece of news, joke, racks in a 30-to-one ratio, effectively buying 60+ trolls before ratio drops. There is no rule to say a developer can't be an ... well, you know.
If this system had a limit of no more than 3 thanks a day per user (maybe more with posts), it would be more precious (I have suggested this for bugzilla). Also, if infractions would be temporary suspension then the matter need not be definitely resolved. Just wait it out, for someone who gets one per week there's no loss.
However, a pro troller would eat up through his reserves in a day (especially with exponential rates), reverting to a 0% karma, conveniently helping me ignore said views.
For example, on some sites that have nothing to do with torrents, there are comments on pages that are not torrents of any kind. Let's assume that one sees a page with a comment that says "This page that Ndi has no intention of downloading contains a virus!!! (Karma: -2)" and another that says "This page that has nothing illegal on it is fine (Karma: +254)". See how easy it is to get decent info on completely empty pages?
But, this is about closed threads, not policing methods, so I'm retiring. Additionally, I very much doubt anyone will change a working system, especially one integrated with other services.
Oh, one more thing. You said that this generates defensiveness from people agreeing with modded post. This is why the system never works unless it's backed by clear rules. No OT means no OT, there is no disagreeing. If rules say ranting is OK, then ranting passes. This doesn't work for -say- poor taste.
N900 dead and Nokia no longer replaces them. Thanks for all the fish.
Keep the forums clean: use "Thanks" button instead of the thank you post.