Page 9 of 28 « First 78 9 101119 Last »
Reply
Thread Tools
sjgadsby is offline sjgadsby
2010-06-21 , 19:53
Posts: 5,335 | Thanked: 8,187 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Pennsylvania, USA
#81
Originally Posted by gabby131 View Post
is putting a "Sticky" on this thread's title possible?
This thread is already sticky, so you should be set.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to sjgadsby For This Useful Post:
skalogre's Avatar
skalogre is offline skalogre
2010-06-21 , 19:54
Posts: 327 | Thanked: 249 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Λεμεσιανός, ρε!
#82
Ok, now I am really confused. Is abil_uk making an actual point on a thread he hadn't realised he shouldn't (akin to using a pogo stick in an anti-personnel minefield) or being nice enough to give us the first test case for the new policy?
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to skalogre For This Useful Post:
mmurfin87 is offline mmurfin87
2010-06-21 , 19:59
Posts: 307 | Thanked: 157 times | Joined on Jul 2009 @ Illinois, USA
#83
Not sure I agree/understand the point of Permanent Banning and disallowing multiple accounts.

Permanent Banning is never permanent. Its so easy to get around an IP ban its laughable. Furthermore, at some point that member might change their mind and come back to be a useful contributer.

Secondly, maybe I want to have a personal account for myself and a second account to represent a company I am authorized to represent. Or a second account just to use for any purpose that I don't want to be associated with my personal one.
 
skalogre's Avatar
skalogre is offline skalogre
2010-06-21 , 20:02
Posts: 327 | Thanked: 249 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Λεμεσιανός, ρε!
#84
Originally Posted by mmurfin87 View Post
Not sure I agree/understand the point of Permanent Banning and disallowing multiple accounts.

Permanent Banning is never permanent. Its so easy to get around an IP ban its laughable. Furthermore, at some point that member might change their mind and come back to be a useful contributer.

Secondly, maybe I want to have a personal account for myself and a second account to represent a company I am authorized to represent. Or a second account just to use for any purpose that I don't want to be associated with my personal one.
I believe that has been answered http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...3&postcount=43
 

The Following User Says Thank You to skalogre For This Useful Post:
mmurfin87 is offline mmurfin87
2010-06-21 , 20:09
Posts: 307 | Thanked: 157 times | Joined on Jul 2009 @ Illinois, USA
#85
Originally Posted by skalogre View Post
I believe that has been answered http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...3&postcount=43

Ehh not really. I was considering those as two separate issues.

Permanent Banning as a system for dealing with forum abusers isn't something I see as ideal.

According to the infractions there is a 20 point penalty simply for making a second account. Sure Reggie said its ok in some situations, but then why is it in the list of infractions? And why is there a separate list of infractions and rules where some rules appear as infractions but some infractions don't appear as rules. Whats the difference?
 

The Following User Says Thank You to mmurfin87 For This Useful Post:
gabby131 is offline gabby131
2010-06-21 , 20:17
Posts: 1,729 | Thanked: 388 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Canada
#86
"No Referral Links Allowed?"

does this mean I can no longer put external links for a source?
__________________
if i did help you, just click "Thanks" on the lower right of my post. thanks!

"The best way to break a Spell is to prevent it from being cast in the first place"

N900: 1000/1150mhz; sampling_rate 15; up_threshold 150000;
 
Reggie's Avatar
Reggie is offline Reggie
2010-06-21 , 20:19
Posts: 1,436 | Thanked: 3,144 times | Joined on Jul 2005
#87
Originally Posted by gabby131 View Post
"No Referral Links Allowed?"

does this mean I can no longer put external links for a source?
Referral links in this case means posting a link with a referral code that aims to solicit clicks / sales to earn profit.
__________________
Reggie Suplido
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Reggie For This Useful Post:
skalogre's Avatar
skalogre is offline skalogre
2010-06-21 , 20:19
Posts: 327 | Thanked: 249 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Λεμεσιανός, ρε!
#88
Originally Posted by mmurfin87 View Post
Ehh not really. I was considering those as two separate issues.

Permanent Banning as a system for dealing with forum abusers isn't something I see as ideal.

According to the infractions there is a 20 point penalty simply for making a second account. Sure Reggie said its ok in some situations, but then why is it in the list of infractions? And why is there a separate list of infractions and rules where some rules appear as infractions but some infractions don't appear as rules. Whats the difference?
That post was in response to the scenario that Helmuth mentioned in this post:
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...3&postcount=38
Sounds similar, no?

Originally Posted by gabby131 View Post
"No Referral Links Allowed?"

does this mean I can no longer put external links for a source?




But seriously, I believe that rule is reference to for-profit linking. Right? if so it sounds perfectly reasonable.

Edit: Reggie answered while I was typing.
Last edited by skalogre; 2010-06-21 at 20:22.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to skalogre For This Useful Post:
abill_uk is offline abill_uk
2010-06-21 , 20:25
Banned | Posts: 3,412 | Thanked: 1,043 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#89
Originally Posted by skalogre View Post
Ok, now I am really confused. Is abil_uk making an actual point on a thread he hadn't realised he shouldn't (akin to using a pogo stick in an anti-personnel minefield) or being nice enough to give us the first test case for the new policy?
I just gave my honest opinion which surely i am entitled to do ! and as i also praised this forum for being here and never made any rude comments why do you feel the need to even comment in the way you did?.
Please dont prove me right aye because i want more than anything for good fair rules to settle this community to a good standard of pleasurable reading and that starts from the top down.... Reggie and his team.
 
gabby131 is offline gabby131
2010-06-21 , 20:31
Posts: 1,729 | Thanked: 388 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Canada
#90
i hope this will be my last question:

"Infraction points accumulate / stack-up as well as expire. Misbehaving members accumulate infraction points and, depending on the total number the member has accumulated in a month, he/she can be banned for 1, 3, 7 or 30 days, or even forever. If a member is not permanently banned, infraction points expire within 30 days -- a member with 10 infraction points will be clean of infractions if he/she behaves for a month."


if example, I violated rules which total of 30 points, and then i am suspended for 3 days. when my account is again active, i still have 30 days before the points expire.

but i misbehave again before 30 days and fined for 10 points so does that gives me a total of 40 points and again suspended but for 7 days?
__________________
if i did help you, just click "Thanks" on the lower right of my post. thanks!

"The best way to break a Spell is to prevent it from being cast in the first place"

N900: 1000/1150mhz; sampling_rate 15; up_threshold 150000;
 
Reply
Page 9 of 28 « First 78 9 101119 Last »

Tags
commandments, community, infractions, rules, t.m.o. policy

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:04.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top