![]() |
2010-06-21
, 21:30
|
Banned |
Posts: 3,412 |
Thanked: 1,043 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#102
|
What? Why should maemo community be responsible on questions considering Nokia' s situation?
It has always been "issue" that people think this is Nokia's support forum. I have at least recently tried to put links to Nokia's support forums on my threads where i help people. Maybe links to right side under toolbar to point users to that direction would be good move.
Semi off topic, but i do not follow you completely here.
![]() |
2010-06-21
, 21:35
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#103
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ysss For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-06-21
, 21:38
|
Posts: 2,829 |
Thanked: 1,459 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Finland
|
#104
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to slender For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-06-21
, 21:47
|
Banned |
Posts: 3,412 |
Thanked: 1,043 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#105
|
@abill
To some extent people give support here. BUT it's not because we are obligated to give it or that we advertise it or Nokia says that this is support forum. NO. If people choose to give support here (like me) it's just individuals choice to do it. I will not give any vote to idea that this forum would market itself as support place to maemo/meego device owners. This is mainly talk area for 3rd party devels and users.
And about name change. IMO Maemo will probably stay maemo for some time. There might be new community website driven towards meego platform where maemo.org will be integrated after some time. Actually do we already have here meego talk area?
![]() |
2010-06-21
, 21:51
|
Posts: 69 |
Thanked: 7 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#106
|
![]() |
2010-06-21
, 21:53
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#107
|
Texrat joked with me a little while ago "bad talk of Nokia gets a weeks ban" and as a mod he is IMO the best on here but his joke may well become reality... scary thought aye.
![]() |
2010-06-21
, 21:53
|
|
Posts: 1,436 |
Thanked: 3,144 times |
Joined on Jul 2005
|
#108
|
So the infraction should really be worded "Creating additional accounts with the intention of avoiding existing infraction penalties".
![]() |
2010-06-21
, 21:54
|
Posts: 2,829 |
Thanked: 1,459 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Finland
|
#109
|
![]() |
2010-06-21
, 22:05
|
Banned |
Posts: 3,412 |
Thanked: 1,043 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#110
|
@abill
Support banned...whaat?
Did you read first post?
"For comments, complaints and suggestions concerning Nokia or its policies, please visit the official Nokia forums: Nokia Europe, and Nokia USA."
Problem here is that support is given many times fast but then it starts to drivel away from resolution. Quite often it's when the answer is regarded as not good enough (workaround) and then OP or other users starts to complain about Nokia's policies. I have been guilty on that bashing and i admit that it's stupid stupid stupid and kills creativity and whole purpose of this place.
![]() |
Tags |
commandments, community, infractions, rules, t.m.o. policy |
Thread Tools | |
|
You're absolutely right. And here I thought I had read this thread completely. Apparently I missed a page.
This way, someone with an account that has been suspended for any length of time, who wants to make a second account to continue their misbehavior still has to deal with the mentor, who will of course disapprove of all their posts.
This accomplishes two things with one stone: A subjectively better approach to dealing with disruption, and a system for introducing and preparing new members to be constructive members.
Just thoughts I had.