![]() |
2010-07-08
, 11:48
|
Posts: 1,751 |
Thanked: 844 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Sweden
|
#41
|
![]() |
2010-07-08
, 11:49
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#42
|
Why can't we all accept that we made the biggest blunder when we bought N900 and also nokia cheated with us and also we had very high expectations for support from nokia. In the end we are the losers.
The N900 has been superceded by newer hardware because that is the way it goes on mobile development but the N900 will go on a lot longer than anything brought out in the past simply because it is the first mobile computer and has turned out to be a great test bed for software developers and will continue to do so for some time yet.
It is a design started from the first quarter of 2009 and since it's release a lot has been learned by Nokia so i suspect strongly it has turned out to be the "prototype" mobile computer from Nokia in the hands of the general public.
All i can say is watch out for future devices from Nokia knowing what they have learned from the N900 as it will only get better and better.
![]() |
2010-07-08
, 11:53
|
Posts: 362 |
Thanked: 145 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Sydney, Australia
|
#44
|
![]() |
2010-07-08
, 11:57
|
Posts: 274 |
Thanked: 82 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#45
|
The Following User Says Thank You to teh For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-07-08
, 11:58
|
|
Posts: 191 |
Thanked: 46 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ NanJing China
|
#46
|
Hmm I dont know if I would say dissapointing.
I will agree that the n900 could do with more physical memory than 256MB however on thinking about it in the 7 months I've owned mine I have not gotten an out of memory once! (there is virtual memory too which is slower but still it helps a lot...)
256MB on the root fs however is somewhat restrictive even with the fixes put in for pr1.2, I have been down to 12kb as ovi store downloads into /var/tmp
Retina display and amoled... I feel that retina display is a bit of a marketing gimmic, it is 640 x 960 and the N900 is 800 x 480. Its definately a higher resolution than the n900 but is it really that visible to the naked eye, my n900 looks pretty damn sharp to me, so is retina really that much better? As for amoled, I have heard reports that while it is brighter and sharper it is harder to read in bright sunshine - this is not a problem I ever have with the n900 which is great!
Battery life for all smart phones seems on par with the n900, maybe the n900 is a little worse but I dont know I only have an n900...
The form factor (brick) could be much better but its got a physical keyboard which is great, I wish it was thinner but I cannot really complain its not that bad at all for whats packed into it! Check out the motorola droid/milestone which is slimmer than the n900 and packs a keyboard however the keyboard from what you read sucks as the keys are all flat and its harder to type on! The droid also packs a larger screen at 3.7" which is what Nokia should have done for the N900 from the get go...
In terms of processors it seems to be that this year has really been the year of the 1Ghz snapdragon processor, the N900 came out last november so it is somewhat dated now. However when you consider the OS it more than makes up for it, it is also still a pretty potent CPU with users reporting overclocking to around 1Ghz possible.
There is definately room for improvement with the n900 and hopefully nokia takes all of this into consideration for the upcoming meego device.
The problem with mobiles and electronics in general nowadays is that the minute you buy the latest device from any company, give it a week and it is old hat as some other company has come out with something bigger and better!
I for one am still very happy with my n900 and find it is continually up to everything I throw at it...
![]() |
2010-07-08
, 12:05
|
Banned |
Posts: 3,412 |
Thanked: 1,043 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#47
|
Your statement isn't entirely true.
a) Some people (particularly the older forum users) knew what they were getting into.
b) Nokia's customer support has always sucked. But I think everyone is dissapointed that the N900 doesn't have more support. Though I think most of us who remember "fixed in Fremantle" aren't surprised by it. But yes, still dissapointed that Nokia hasn't learned its lesson yet.
Nokia takes too long to learn from Maemo's success. They should've started throwing ALOT more weight behind it the moment the n800 was a success.
But anyway the whole hardware being outdated thing goes for any consumer electronic. Heck almost anything is outdated by next year. Your car? Outdated by next year. Your HDTV? Outdated by next year. Your laptop? Outdated by next year. You'd be a fool to think that it wouldn't happen to the N900 too. (Post not directed to you abill_uk).
![]() |
2010-07-08
, 12:06
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#48
|
The N900 has been superceded by newer hardware because that is the way it goes on mobile development but the N900 will go on a lot longer than anything brought out in the past simply because it is the first mobile computer and has turned out to be a great test bed for software developers and will continue to do so for some time yet.
All i can say is watch out for future devices from Nokia knowing what they have learned from the N900 as it will only get better and better.
If Steves dream comes to life - HTML5 - we can probably move back to the unified web platform (something i'm not sure Stevo has thought through)
The Following User Says Thank You to ysss For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-07-08
, 12:11
|
Posts: 395 |
Thanked: 165 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ TMO
|
#49
|
So after reading these articles and viewing these comparison pictures I am starting to feel disappointed and ticked off because the n900 is supposed to be the best that Nokia can offer and yet its has **** for hardware.
All the other smart phones have 512mb ram
We get just 256
Our screens dont have retina or amoled technologies
We dont get HDMI out or wireless dlna but just generic VGA
Many other smartphones get wireless n speeds of 200mbps
we get just 54mbps
Many other smartphones have 1280x760 video resolution @ 30fps
we have a lousy 800x400 resolution @ 20~fps
Other smartphones are sleek, sharp and light,
Our phones are bricks and heavy
Other smartphones get better battery's and better battery life.
We get virtually the worst battery life of all smart phones
Other smartphone's graphics chip push almost 30 gpu triangles/s
Our phones graphics chip pushs just 14 gpu triangles/s
Please discuss ! thanks
http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets...stats_v2.0.jpg
http://alienbabeltech.com/main/?p=17125
http://alienbabeltech.com/main/wp-co...recompari1.png
The Following User Says Thank You to rickysio For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-07-08
, 12:19
|
|
Posts: 435 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#50
|
The Following User Says Thank You to windows7 For This Useful Post: | ||