|
2010-07-22
, 15:09
|
Posts: 38 |
Thanked: 18 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Guildford, UK
|
#12
|
|
2010-07-22
, 15:18
|
|
Posts: 601 |
Thanked: 549 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Redditch, UK
|
#13
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Switch_ For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-07-22
, 15:23
|
Posts: 38 |
Thanked: 18 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Guildford, UK
|
#14
|
Strange that the app writes to an Adove format and yet when opened in an Adobe application it all goes a bit..... Well...... Tits up?
The Following User Says Thank You to Crugath For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-07-22
, 23:51
|
Posts: 14 |
Thanked: 124 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
|
#15
|
|
2010-07-22
, 23:58
|
Posts: 13 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Glasgow, United Kingdom
|
#16
|
This is working great, I'll show some sample images in a bit. But I'm having trouble with the DNG images that are saved by FCamera.
The DNGs have a really heavy cyan tint on them when I view them in Adobe Bridge, which is not removable no matter what settings I use in Camera Raw. This is Adobe CS5 btw.
When I try to view them in Irfan View they display as a red garbled mess.
When I check the option to save as JPG as well, these images save absolutely fine.
Anyone got any ideas why the DNGs don't display properly on the PC?
Here's an HDR image I made earlier, merged in Photoshop CS5. http://the-buccaneer.co.uk/image_edi...1279809203.jpg
EDIT:
Here's a photo captured in FCamera - This is the automatic JPG exported image http://the-buccaneer.co.uk/image_edi...1279809705.jpg
And this is the same image but the DNG generated by FCamera as seen in Adobe Photoshop CS5 http://the-buccaneer.co.uk/image_edi...1279809766.jpg
The Following User Says Thank You to ericube For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-07-23
, 06:30
|
Posts: 337 |
Thanked: 192 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Atlanta
|
#17
|
|
2010-07-23
, 06:51
|
|
Posts: 601 |
Thanked: 549 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Redditch, UK
|
#18
|
Found the bug. We were casting a possibly-negative floating point value to an unsigned integer, so the color matrices stored in the DNG files (required to correctly interpret the raw data) went well.... tits up, as switch puts it..
|
2010-07-23
, 07:07
|
Posts: 1,418 |
Thanked: 1,541 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#19
|
|
2010-07-23
, 07:08
|
Posts: 490 |
Thanked: 191 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#20
|
because dng isn't a picture, it is raw data from sensor that has to be converted to picture in order to view it. i am betting on conversion settings.
Want to know something?
K.I.S.S. approach:
wiki category:beginners. Browse it through and you'll be much wiser!
If the link doesn't help, just use
Google Custom Search