![]() |
2007-09-21
, 23:14
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#312
|
![]() |
2007-09-21
, 23:17
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#313
|
because punctuation really matters on the internet. apple just came out with the iphone. its pretty cool you should check it out.
![]() |
2007-09-22
, 01:20
|
|
Posts: 729 |
Thanked: 19 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
|
#314
|
It separates the Obviously Literate from the I'm Too Lazy to Make an Effort crowd.
And the milieu shouldn't matter. Expert communication skills are valued anywhere.
Well maybe Mr. T hacked the game, and made a mowhawk class? And maybe Mr. T is pretty handy with computers? Had that occurred to you Mr. Condescending Director?
![]() |
2007-09-22
, 17:59
|
|
Posts: 641 |
Thanked: 27 times |
Joined on Apr 2007
|
#315
|
![]() |
2007-09-23
, 13:19
|
Posts: 17 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
|
#316
|
so the whole thing is illegible because its missing a single word? go upstairs and ask your mom to decipher it for you.
![]() |
2007-09-23
, 20:50
|
Posts: 246 |
Thanked: 6 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
|
#317
|
No , it's illegible because the whole thing has been written with a total lack of punctuation , correct spelling and capitalisation .
Did you meant to say 'cant' [Insincere expression of sentiments. To speak in jargon. An oblique surface. To cause something to be at an oblique angle] , or perhaps the capitalised version : Cant . Perhaps you meant to say can't [Contracted version of can not] or possibly you intended to say Can't . As to what you intended to say next , with the missing word , is difficult to decode , given the ambiguity of your opening statement .
Next time you need to write some HTML , some C++ or ( worse ) machine code , try missing one item of punctuation , altering some capitalisation or misspelling a single command and you will soon see the importance of 'Getting it right when you write' . Even the internet needs good punctuation .
![]() |
2007-09-23
, 20:56
|
Posts: 246 |
Thanked: 6 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
|
#318
|
![]() |
2007-09-24
, 02:40
|
Posts: 49 |
Thanked: 3 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
|
#319
|
![]() |
2007-09-24
, 03:02
|
Posts: 246 |
Thanked: 6 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
|
#320
|
Wow. What hostility from all here. I hope this isn't the general trend of these forums. Anyway. I think the iPod touch looks very modern and I do think its sleek and sexy. But at its price point for what you get, I don't think its very worth it. I'm sure many would disagree. But I've always found the iPods to be very flimsy and the iPods battery lifespan leaved a lot to be desired. The great thing about the iPod is that it got the attention of the hardware developers back on design along with technology, something that was lacking until Apple stepped into the limelight. So my view is that the Touch is another great design and a good refabrication of the iPhone, but I look forward to what others will come up with.
When I was last in PCWorld, I was fiddling with the display 800 (which was hard as the battery was dead and it was unplugged and shoved out of the way so it kept resetting), and a guy came over watching. He asked if it was a phone, I said no, he thanked me and walked off.
I have never been asked what an iPod was!