![]() |
2010-08-15
, 18:05
|
|
Posts: 2,142 |
Thanked: 2,054 times |
Joined on Dec 2006
@ Sicily
|
#2
|
The Following User Says Thank You to debernardis For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-08-15
, 18:27
|
|
Posts: 2,173 |
Thanked: 2,678 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Cornwall, UK
|
#3
|
Well, I am glad I had problems reflashing on wednesday. I crossposted, I confess. I'd have been with a -20 handicap.
![]() |
2010-08-15
, 19:28
|
|
Posts: 1,359 |
Thanked: 717 times |
Joined on May 2009
@ ...standing right behind you...
|
#4
|
In my bit of the world it is now 15th August. Well into 15th August, in fact. Which by my reckoning means we now Haz Rulz, or words to that effect.
The Following User Says Thank You to silvermountain For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-08-15
, 19:32
|
|
Posts: 2,173 |
Thanked: 2,678 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Cornwall, UK
|
#5
|
![]() |
2010-08-15
, 19:34
|
|
Posts: 1,359 |
Thanked: 717 times |
Joined on May 2009
@ ...standing right behind you...
|
#6
|
Looks like 3 to me, and they're the official greeter sig. I removed all the personal items that were there as well when the rules were announced in order to conform. If the rule is interpreted to disallow the spacing in the greeter sig, I'll remove that too.
I did raise in the rule discussion that the sig length could possibly include an exception to allow those of us using the greeter sig a single line of personal sig, but no comment was made.
![]() |
2010-08-15
, 19:36
|
Posts: 5,795 |
Thanked: 3,151 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Agoura Hills Calif
|
#7
|
![]() |
2010-08-15
, 19:38
|
|
Posts: 2,173 |
Thanked: 2,678 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Cornwall, UK
|
#8
|
I don't see a reason for an exception either as that would just set a bad example.
![]() |
2010-08-15
, 19:41
|
|
Posts: 1,359 |
Thanked: 717 times |
Joined on May 2009
@ ...standing right behind you...
|
#9
|
The exception would be because those acting as greeters are doing the community a favour which the community has specifically asked for. But since none was forth-coming, the point is moot.
![]() |
2010-08-15
, 19:45
|
Posts: 889 |
Thanked: 537 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ scotland
|
#10
|
I would like to draw your attention to the following:
Posts ranting about Nokia or the community which contain unsubstantiated claims are "solely intended to incite controversy or conflict". This is the definition of trolling, and should incur 15 infraction points, once the poster has been given a reasonable time to provide evidence and failed to do so.
Posts which accuse other members of 'attack' when other members have merely offered 'challenge' are "Abuse, insults and personal attacks directed at any member, person, or group" and should be flagged as flaming (15 infraction posts) unless they are so severe as to constitute 'personal attack' (in which care they incur 20 points).
Repeatedly posting the same issue (one could think of MfE provisioning as a good example) in several different threads is spam. (20 points)
The sooner these nice new shiney rules are followed the better, IMHO.
Thank you.
Hi! I'm Kathy and I'm a Maemo Greeter! Welcome.
Useful links for newcomers: New members say hello , New users start here, Community subforum, Beginners' wiki page, Maemo5 101, Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Did you know Meego.com has forums too?