![]() |
2010-11-11
, 19:07
|
Posts: 152 |
Thanked: 58 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
@ void
|
#52
|
here is the error: RX-51_2009SE_10.2010.13-2.VANILLA_PR_EMMC_MR0_ARM.bin
should be the last(newer) one... and not emmc (correct-me if i'm wrong).
![]() |
2010-11-11
, 19:10
|
Posts: 81 |
Thanked: 20 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
|
#53
|
![]() |
2010-11-11
, 19:12
|
|
Posts: 288 |
Thanked: 175 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
@ Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
|
#54
|
![]() |
2010-11-11
, 19:16
|
Posts: 152 |
Thanked: 58 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
@ void
|
#55
|
So if "starting kernel" message got stuck, n900 will -NOT- be charged?
I am having the same problem as being described here.
Is reflashing the stock kernel gonna help?
![]() |
2010-11-11
, 19:25
|
Posts: 11 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
|
#56
|
So if "starting kernel" message got stuck, n900 will -NOT- be charged?
I am having the same problem as being described here.
Is reflashing the stock kernel gonna help?
![]() |
2010-11-11
, 19:29
|
Posts: 10 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
@ Moscow is a big city you know, see you at the maemos.ru нам год
|
#57
|
![]() |
2010-11-11
, 20:19
|
Posts: 103 |
Thanked: 114 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
|
#58
|
"But now quite a few of us (including me) can't even get into the flashing mode"
and me (
![]() |
2010-11-11
, 20:24
|
Posts: 40 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#59
|
![]() |
2010-11-11
, 21:35
|
|
Posts: 1,062 |
Thanked: 961 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Boston, MA
|
#60
|
should be the last(newer) one... and not emmc (correct-me if i'm wrong).