|
2010-11-16
, 10:47
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#22
|
But where is the walled garden in being able to choose your internet connection when using Skype?
The Following User Says Thank You to benny1967 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-11-16
, 10:48
|
|
Posts: 30 |
Thanked: 11 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
@ malaysia
|
#23
|
|
2010-11-16
, 10:59
|
|
Posts: 30 |
Thanked: 11 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
@ malaysia
|
#24
|
|
2010-11-16
, 11:19
|
Posts: 53 |
Thanked: 17 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
|
#25
|
|
2010-11-16
, 11:25
|
|
Posts: 820 |
Thanked: 436 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Portsmouth, UK.
|
#26
|
they came into the market telling everybody that the future is videocall.... and n900 can't videocall !?
|
2010-11-16
, 11:59
|
Posts: 173 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ London, UK
|
#27
|
|
2010-11-16
, 12:35
|
|
Posts: 752 |
Thanked: 284 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ Malaysia
|
#28
|
ha ha..im also still using 2 phone right now..1 for calling,sms and of coz for video calling over 3G with my friends and for my N900 is use for internet and networking during travelling or outstation..hope i can stick to one phone next time..still waiting the moment become truth..
|
2010-11-16
, 12:43
|
|
Posts: 30 |
Thanked: 11 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
@ malaysia
|
#29
|
|
2010-11-16
, 12:55
|
Posts: 1,042 |
Thanked: 430 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#30
|
Question for those of you here:
Why video call over 3g ?
The GSM operators will discover in the near future
their service reduced to voice calls and internet access
due to the simple fact they must charge far more
to implement 'video calls' than what skype and a lot of other
apps already do over the internet.
The cost of implementing video over a network
of which only some minor fraction of customers will ever use
has got to be orders of magnitude greater than the
cost of you and your contact(s) simply installing
skype, linphone or whatever.
Or is there some other urgent reason I need to shell out another
chunk of my paycheck each month to my telco provider
to pay for the cost of implementing a service which only
1% of their customers will ever actually use?
... because the telco charge everyone for making this possible.
But where is the walled garden in being able to choose your internet connection when using Skype?
imo 3G is the standard developed to milk mobile network customer's cash. If it wasn't it might have actually grown some user base after front camera's got introduced on mobile phones many years.
Skype has a lot of advantages. It is popular. The video calling is there if you choose to use it.
It gives that N900 front camera on at least a few hours of play time before it gets recycled.
Have you ever succeeded calling an unsuspecting friend in Video on his Linux or windows PC with standard 3G videocal? Sitting outside without extra cost? Without dragin a laptop?
I vote for both 3G videocall (because it is the standard especially for India) and Skype integration (because it is useful and has videocal)