eme
|
2010-09-30
, 07:38
|
Posts: 121 |
Thanked: 35 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
|
#91
|
|
2010-09-30
, 07:43
|
Posts: 1,425 |
Thanked: 983 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Hong Kong
|
#92
|
|
2010-09-30
, 07:51
|
Posts: 304 |
Thanked: 176 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#93
|
The Following User Says Thank You to jessi3k3 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-09-30
, 11:01
|
Posts: 274 |
Thanked: 82 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#94
|
This is probably old but has anyone tested this?
http://focus.ti.com/docs/toolsw/fold...rder%20Options
Got the link from the Pandora forums. They got a flash 10.1 demo to run on the Pandora but it seems to be even worse than what's on maemo.
Original Thread
http://www.gp32x.com/board/index.php...for-cortex-a8/
Here's a video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjL6VBWaHrU
The Following User Says Thank You to teh For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-09-30
, 12:26
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#95
|
So it's just like with your desktop PC, where the support for Flash is coming from Microsoft/Dell/HP/whoever... NOT!
I really cannot se how people see this as Nokia's fault. Adobe has the software but doesn't want to release it. It is Adobe's decision and their fault.
Do you guys really think that Nokia should be paying every software company out there just to get us users free software? I don't.
|
2010-09-30
, 12:49
|
Posts: 523 |
Thanked: 292 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#96
|
|
2010-09-30
, 13:02
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#97
|
It is my understanding Nokia are still selling the N900, if they are how can they continue to sell it with Flash which is now out of date, so much for the device having the best internet experience!
I understand we will not get Flash 10 even if we decide to upgrade to the meego o/s. It owuld be interesting to know just hom much Adobe are trying to chage Nokia for use of Flash 10.
The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-09-30
, 13:16
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#98
|
Unlike a real desktop computer, Flash on those deal with a desktop variant of the browser that works in a generic x86 environment that's dictated by those browsers. They deal directly with Microsoft for ActiveX/Internet Explorer, Google for Google Chrome, Mozilla for Firefox. So in essence, they'd have to deal directly with Nokia for MicroB.
How would they deal with them if Nokia isn't supporting it any more?
|
2010-09-30
, 15:37
|
Posts: 523 |
Thanked: 292 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#99
|
Quite easily, honestly. They're selling Android phones with 2.1, right? It doesn't support Flash 10.1 either. The selling of the phones with Flash 9.x is commonplace. It's the update that's actually quote "odd" - not many phones received Flash updates in the past.
To be honest, MicroB delivers the "best internet experience"... it reacts just like I would expect a desktop to react to websites, et al.
Or... we'll get Flash 10.1 on the N900 if some enterprising soul backports it. All of this talk about what Adobe "charges" is unverified.
|
2010-09-30
, 15:41
|
|
Posts: 1,885 |
Thanked: 2,008 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ OVI MAPS
|
#100
|
The Following User Says Thank You to NvyUs For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
bada bada, delete adobe, delete everyone, delete me, delete nokia, delete us, delete you, give us bada, worstthreadever |
Thread Tools | |
|