Poll: Should MeeGo devs inform maemo.org users through talk.maemo.org?
Poll Options
Should MeeGo devs inform maemo.org users through talk.maemo.org?

Reply
Thread Tools
Dave999's Avatar
Posts: 7,075 | Thanked: 9,073 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
#91
Infraction points for something. This thread is cursed. I need to stay away fr.o.m. It.
 
Flandry's Avatar
Posts: 1,559 | Thanked: 1,786 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Boston
#92
Originally Posted by sjgadsby View Post
Yes, watch yourself or I'll raise your refractive index again.
On the other hand, refractory points are good against flaming...

I don't understand why meego discussion is such a touchy topic for some of the community members. At worst it makes things a bit confusing when mixed in with with maemo discussion.
__________________

Unofficial PR1.3/Meego 1.1 FAQ

***
Classic example of arbitrary Nokia decision making. Couldn't just fallback to the no brainer of tagging with lat/lon if network isn't accessible, could you Nokia?
MAME: an arcade in your pocket
Accelemymote: make your accelerometer more joy-ful
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Flandry For This Useful Post:
ScottishDuck's Avatar
Posts: 76 | Thanked: 87 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ Scotland
#93
Originally Posted by Flandry View Post
On the other hand, refractory points are good against flaming...

I don't understand why meego discussion is such a touchy topic for some of the community members. At worst it makes things a bit confusing when mixed in with with maemo discussion.
It becomes a touchy subject because we have members who spread misinformation.
__________________
Pirate Party UK - www.pirateparty.org.uk
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ScottishDuck For This Useful Post:
Posts: 724 | Thanked: 1,255 times | Joined on Nov 2007 @ Cambridge, UK
#94
Yeah, I hate that it has got so political. It's getting to the point where MeeGo and Symbian (at least in this forum) are thought of as being synonymous in quality. Which just isn't true, MeeGo N900 CE is really great at the moment, and getting better everyday. We just need developers to start porting apps so it's not such a barren landscape
 

The Following User Says Thank You to tswindell For This Useful Post:
Banned | Posts: 974 | Thanked: 622 times | Joined on Oct 2010
#95
Originally Posted by ScottishDuck View Post
It becomes a touchy subject because we have members who spread misinformation.
If MeeGo did live up to its hype and was at least somewhat usable by now, this wouldn't be a touchy subject.
 
ScottishDuck's Avatar
Posts: 76 | Thanked: 87 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ Scotland
#96
Originally Posted by ericsson View Post
If MeeGo did live up to its hype and was at least somewhat usable by now, this wouldn't be a touchy subject.
It is more than usable at the moment. Oh look, that misinformation I was talking about.
__________________
Pirate Party UK - www.pirateparty.org.uk
 
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#97
Originally Posted by ericsson View Post
If MeeGo did live up to its hype and was at least somewhat usable by now, this wouldn't be a touchy subject.
I am using MeeGo 1.1 very well on my Lenovo netbook. Issues are minor, and no worse than those encountered on much more mature platforms.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 
Banned | Posts: 974 | Thanked: 622 times | Joined on Oct 2010
#98
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
I am using MeeGo 1.1 very well on my Lenovo netbook. Issues are minor, and no worse than those encountered on much more mature platforms.
I also have MeeGo on my HP mini, but I never use it because Joli Cloud is much better in just about every single aspect (I am being dead honest and objective now). Joli Cloud is made for end users, and work straight out of the box, with MeeGo I have to manually compile (yes - compile) and then install the network drivers to have any sort of functional netbook. Obviously compiling the network drivers is only for the geeky minority.

Anyway, I was talking about MeeGo on the N900 (phone, GSM, talk, MMS, 3G, ARM etc), not MeeGo for X86.
 
Posts: 724 | Thanked: 1,255 times | Joined on Nov 2007 @ Cambridge, UK
#99
Originally Posted by ericsson View Post
...

Anyway, I was talking about MeeGo on the N900 (phone, GSM, talk, MMS, 3G, ARM etc), not MeeGo for X86.
Pretty much all the normal phone functionality works. Power saving isn't bad, not quite as good as Maemo but I've been using one of my N900s with MeeGo CE on it for about a month, as a primary phone (my personal one, I use another with maemo for work).
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to tswindell For This Useful Post:
erendorn's Avatar
Posts: 738 | Thanked: 983 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ London
#100
Originally Posted by ericsson View Post
with MeeGo I have to manually compile (yes - compile) and then install the network drivers to have any sort of functional netbook. Obviously compiling the network drivers is only for the geeky minority.
That's why I don't have meego on my netbook :/

but MeeGo CE is improving fast imo.
 
Reply

Tags
context, debate, developers, frappadecaf, infraction pts, javis vs. woody, let's troll!, meego, relevance

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:03.