[ANNOUNCE] CSSU-thumb thread - stable Thumb2 on N900 - Page 102 - maemo.org

Active Topics

The N900 is now 15 years old! (9)
to Nokia N900 by Arno_11 - 4 hrs, 7 mins ago
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (4)
to SailfishOS by Maemish - 5 days, 16 hrs ago
more...

Page 102 of 227

102

Thread Tools

	ste-phan	2012-10-29 , 20:41
	Posts: 1,196 \| Thanked: 2,708 times \| Joined on Jan 2010 @ Hanoi	#1011

Both pulseaudio versions do take about 14-16% CPU of 600Mhz when playing "Closer to where you want me" (standard supplied song)

-no difference between old and updated Pulsaudio in CPU usage
-memory footprint: 1,88 % for old and 1,63% for new
-Pulseaudio goes to sleep after quit

Quote & Reply |

The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to ste-phan For This Useful Post:
don_falcone, Estel, freemangordon, fw190, misiak, mosiomm, nkirk, Nobless, Sourav.dubey, Sphinx780, Xagoln

freemangordon	2012-10-29 , 22:29
Posts: 3,074 \| Thanked: 12,960 times \| Joined on Mar 2010 @ Sofia,Bulgaria	#1012

Originally Posted by Estel

Continuation of:
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...postcount=1007

After killing pulseaudio manually (from xterm), hildon-home started to use 99% of CPU power, @900mhz. Strange, as I don't have any "multimedia" wikdgets (hardly any widgets at all...). Killing hildon-home Bring everything back to normal - no more oddities.
---

pulseaudio CPU usage, during playback of .ogg q=6 file, is ~7% @ 500 mhz. mafw-dbus-wrapper adds another 3-4%, and openmediaplayer throws 2-3% in. Total CPU usage during playback of said file, with screen on and conky, is 23-30% - would be 5-7% less with device locked and no Conky.

Looks just about OK, if not right, if not "great!"

/Estel

the correct way is:

stop pulseaudio
start pulseaudio

Though I recommend a reboot, just in case

__________________
Never fear. I is here.

720p video support on N900,SmartReflex on N900,Keyboard and mouse support on N900
Nothing is impossible - Stable thumb2 on n900

Community SSU developer
kernel-power developer and maintainer

Quote & Reply |

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to freemangordon For This Useful Post:
Estel, fw190, mosiomm, nkirk, Sourav.dubey

freemangordon	2012-10-29 , 22:31
Posts: 3,074 \| Thanked: 12,960 times \| Joined on Mar 2010 @ Sofia,Bulgaria	#1013

Originally Posted by don_falcone

pulseaudio-module-bluetooth - conflicts pulseaudio << 0.9.14-2
pulseaudio-esound-compat - conflicts pulseaudio << 0.9.14-2
pulseaudio - conflicts pulseaudio-module-nokia-voice << 0.9.15.0-42

Is that correct? All other pulseaudio-related packages upgraded fine.

Are you sure you are on PR1.3? As that looks really strange.

Quote & Reply |

The Following User Says Thank You to freemangordon For This Useful Post:
fw190

	Estel	2012-10-29 , 22:55
	Posts: 5,028 \| Thanked: 8,613 times \| Joined on Mar 2011	#1014

Originally Posted by don_falcone

pulseaudio-module-bluetooth - conflicts pulseaudio << 0.9.14-2
pulseaudio-esound-compat - conflicts pulseaudio << 0.9.14-2
pulseaudio - conflicts pulseaudio-module-nokia-voice << 0.9.15.0-42

Is that correct? All other pulseaudio-related packages upgraded fine.

Exactly same errors here, but fapman let me upgrade them all, and everything works fine. I'm definitely on PR1.3. I remember this error, seen it before (can't recall why I've reinstalled pulseaudio bits), and it ws always harmless.

Control file mess-up by Nokia?

/Estel

__________________
N900's aluminum backcover / body replacement
-
N900's HDMI-Out
-
Camera cover MOD
-
Measure battery's real capacity on-device
-
TrueCrypt 7.1 | ereswap | bnf
-
Hardware's mods research is costly. To support my work, please consider donating. Thank You!

Quote & Reply |

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post:
don_falcone, fw190, Sourav.dubey

freemangordon	2012-10-30 , 19:02
Posts: 3,074 \| Thanked: 12,960 times \| Joined on Mar 2010 @ Sofia,Bulgaria	#1015

2 more packages in -thumb - calendar-backend and EDS. Will wait for a couple of days and if there are no issues, will issue a new -mp

Quote & Reply |

The Following 21 Users Say Thank You to freemangordon For This Useful Post:
ahmadamaj, ed_boner, Estel, foobar, fw190, HELLASISGREECE, Hurrian, klinglerware, malkavian, marmistrz, mosiomm, mr_pingu, nkirk, Nobless, sifo, sixwheeledbeast, Skaven2k2, Sourav.dubey, ste-phan, wumpwoast, zeljkobo12

	Estel	2012-10-30 , 23:18
	Posts: 5,028 \| Thanked: 8,613 times \| Joined on Mar 2011	#1016

Installed, no issues so far. What the hell is EDS responsible for, so could do more thorough testing (calendar tested in every strange way I was able to try)?
---

Different thing - lately (= few weeks, maybe longer), I have observed, that many times in idle, xorg uses slightly more % of CPU time, than it used to. May it be similar thing as with thumb packaging of pulseaudio?

/Estel

Quote & Reply |

The Following User Says Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post:
Sourav.dubey

freemangordon	2012-10-31 , 07:04
Posts: 3,074 \| Thanked: 12,960 times \| Joined on Mar 2010 @ Sofia,Bulgaria	#1017

Originally Posted by Estel

Installed, no issues so far. What the hell is EDS responsible for, so could do more thorough testing (calendar tested in every strange way I was able to try)?
---

Different thing - lately (= few weeks, maybe longer), I have observed, that many times in idle, xorg uses slightly more % of CPU time, than it used to. May it be similar thing as with thumb packaging of pulseaudio?

/Estel

http://wiki.maemo.org/Documentation/...on_Data_Server

Hmm, it might be because I recompiled clutter with -O3 -ffast-math -ftree-vectorize. The same flags that was causing pulseaudio to use more CPU than usual

. Though for a correct measurement you need to have your CPU frequency locked

Quote & Reply |

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to freemangordon For This Useful Post:
Estel, fw190, misiak, mosiomm, Sourav.dubey

reinob	2012-10-31 , 09:42
Posts: 1,808 \| Thanked: 4,272 times \| Joined on Feb 2011 @ Germany	#1018

Originally Posted by don_falcone

pulseaudio-esound-compat - conflicts pulseaudio << 0.9.14-2

do we actually need esound-compat for anything? apt-get seems to be fine with deleting it (no packages depend on it), but with dependencies you never know.

does any program actually use esd?

Quote & Reply |

The Following User Says Thank You to reinob For This Useful Post:
Estel

freemangordon	2012-10-31 , 09:45
Posts: 3,074 \| Thanked: 12,960 times \| Joined on Mar 2010 @ Sofia,Bulgaria	#1019

Originally Posted by reinob

do we actually need esound-compat for anything? apt-get seems to be fine with deleting it (no packages depend on it), but with dependencies you never know.

does any program actually use esd?

No idea, but it seems stock -pr depends on it, so...

Quote & Reply |

The Following User Says Thank You to freemangordon For This Useful Post:
Estel

reinob	2012-10-31 , 09:55
Posts: 1,808 \| Thanked: 4,272 times \| Joined on Feb 2011 @ Germany	#1020

Originally Posted by freemangordon

No idea, but it seems stock -pr depends on it, so...

AFAIK it has been a long-standing "bug" ("upstream") that pulseaudio included the esound compatibility as a dependency. Maybe 10 years ago it made sense. I spotted this package yesterday in my Ubuntu 12.04 and purged it with no adverse effects.

I have just done that on my N900. Seems OK. I don't want to start a discussion on what CSSU should do and what it should not do, but I personally think that it's about time to stop caring about one-to-one compatibility with Nokia PR/SSU, so CSSU-team could test/check if this dependency is actually needed, and if not, remove it.