The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Zeta For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2017-04-19
, 22:11
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#102
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2017-04-20
, 05:46
|
Community Council |
Posts: 4,920 |
Thanked: 12,867 times |
Joined on May 2012
@ Southerrn Finland
|
#103
|
|
2017-04-20
, 13:23
|
|
Posts: 634 |
Thanked: 3,266 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Colombia
|
#105
|
Hmm i coul pull one of the shielding caps from the pcb, but don't know if n950 will like it if i pull out my heat gun
The deciding question is what is the hardware platform, is it intel or arm?
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to wicket For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2017-04-20
, 14:27
|
Posts: 1,196 |
Thanked: 1,413 times |
Joined on Aug 2011
|
#106
|
Hmm, no screws? Now I wonder if the case damage comes from it being prised open.
What about the I²C errors that are specific to the Moorestown/Medfield I²C chip (as shown in the patch in the mailing list linked to by Dirk)? There are the other pointers such as "medfield_wifi_power" in the local mode photo and "MEDFIELD" in Dirk's Windows device manager screenshot. Perhaps n950 could tell us what his photo of the Intel logo actually is (the battery icon makes me wonder if it is a boot screen). I'm not saying you're wrong, but so far I've seen no indication that the hardware platform might be ARM.
|
2017-04-20
, 16:07
|
Community Council |
Posts: 4,920 |
Thanked: 12,867 times |
Joined on May 2012
@ Southerrn Finland
|
#107
|
What about the I²C errors that are specific to the Moorestown/Medfield I²C chip (as shown in the patch in the mailing list linked to by Dirk)? There are the other pointers such as "medfield_wifi_power" in the local mode photo and "MEDFIELD" in Dirk's Windows device manager screenshot.
|
2017-04-22
, 22:07
|
Posts: 1,196 |
Thanked: 1,413 times |
Joined on Aug 2011
|
#108
|
|
2017-04-23
, 20:40
|
Posts: 4 |
Thanked: 20 times |
Joined on Apr 2017
|
#109
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to sasha19323 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2017-04-23
, 22:02
|
Posts: 1,196 |
Thanked: 1,413 times |
Joined on Aug 2011
|
#110
|
I'm student of university of telecommmunications here in Russia. We have IoT labaratory founded by Intel and we were working w/ Medfield platform. We can take a look for some hardware and software, if it's needed.
The Following User Says Thank You to n950 For This Useful Post: | ||
I wonder how much of the flasher/bootloader is tied specifically to ARM ?
Here, we have an Intel x86 device, not an ARM based one like all previous Nokia (If I am not mistaken).
The flasher program is really low level - at least from what I remember when using it for Symbian, where we could flash a dead device through USB. That means, there is a bootloader of some sort in the device, separate form the OS. What I don't know is if this bootloader is part of the chip (like DfuSe in STM32 devices, which would then likely be different/incompatible when switching to x86), or if it is simply a part of firmware (like U-boot or Grub) which could then have been implemented in a compatible way in a x86 device ?
Is there any master who would knows more on this ?