The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-05-18
, 15:07
|
Posts: 347 |
Thanked: 441 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
|
#122
|
As for 18650, stlpaul described it accurately. Being widely used, standardized, cheaper (as money You need to pay per mAh), easily available in plentora of types, etc, benefits of using them over standard "phone" flat batteries are gigantic. It's just that they're little harder to fit, due to cylindrical size. But, even having this restriction in mind, they still supply more mAh per square cm. (even considering a "loss" due to empty space between cylinders).
Only one drawback, is that You can't go lower than width of one single cell, i.e. it have a minimum thickness much bigger than flat battery. But, for people that already use Mugen covers for dual-batteries, it should be a problem - as long as it still fits into pocket I would happily trade few mm of additional thickness for having 6000 mAh + additional mod space + guarantee, that my batteries won't ever disappear like scuds + cheaper batteries
as opposed to:
3000 mAh and lack of all mentioned benefits.
/Estel
The Following User Says Thank You to The Wizard of Huz For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-05-18
, 15:10
|
Posts: 347 |
Thanked: 441 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
|
#123
|
|
2012-05-18
, 15:38
|
Posts: 347 |
Thanked: 441 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
|
#124
|
The Following User Says Thank You to The Wizard of Huz For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-05-18
, 19:24
|
|
Posts: 131 |
Thanked: 170 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Netherlands
|
#125
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ffha For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-05-19
, 01:19
|
Posts: 1,225 |
Thanked: 1,905 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Quezon City, Philippines
|
#126
|
|
2012-05-19
, 07:47
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#127
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-05-19
, 10:46
|
|
Posts: 1,503 |
Thanked: 2,688 times |
Joined on Oct 2010
@ Denmark
|
#128
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to dr_frost_dk For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-05-19
, 11:25
|
Posts: 347 |
Thanked: 441 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
|
#129
|
|
2012-05-20
, 01:46
|
Posts: 68 |
Thanked: 43 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
|
#130
|
The Following User Says Thank You to phr For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
antenna, backcover, external, gangam_style, mugen cover, n900 body, neo900, sarcasm, where is estel |
Thread Tools | |
|
---
As for 18650, stlpaul described it accurately. Being widely used, standardized, cheaper (as money You need to pay per mAh), easily available in plentora of types, etc, benefits of using them over standard "phone" flat batteries are gigantic. It's just that they're little harder to fit, due to cylindrical size. But, even having this restriction in mind, they still supply more mAh per square cm. (even considering a "loss" due to empty space between cylinders).
Only one drawback, is that You can't go lower than width of one single cell, i.e. it have a minimum thickness much bigger than flat battery. But, for people that already use Mugen covers for dual-batteries, it should be a problem - as long as it still fits into pocket I would happily trade few mm of additional thickness for having 6000 mAh + additional mod space + guarantee, that my batteries won't ever disappear like scuds + cheaper batteries
as opposed to:
3000 mAh and lack of all mentioned benefits.
/Estel
N900's aluminum backcover / body replacement
-
N900's HDMI-Out
-
Camera cover MOD
-
Measure battery's real capacity on-device
-
TrueCrypt 7.1 | ereswap | bnf
-
Hardware's mods research is costly. To support my work, please consider donating. Thank You!