|
2011-02-14
, 06:09
|
Posts: 45 |
Thanked: 20 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
|
#1352
|
The Following User Says Thank You to exo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-02-14
, 06:34
|
|
Posts: 455 |
Thanked: 782 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Netherlands
|
#1353
|
However, it doesn't do a difference to original statement - Android and Maemo are similar and Android succeess crushes any speaches that WM is more suitable for sucess on mobile market.
They used for "flagship" N900 not very good CPU and then say that Maemo can't be better than competitors choice!
Android actually runs faster then Maemo. But some manufacturers choose run graphic without acceleration due to CPU price list and software development efforts and that choice requires a fast CPU without any GPU
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to zwer For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-02-14
, 07:58
|
Posts: 992 |
Thanked: 738 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Low Earth Orbit
|
#1354
|
|
2011-02-14
, 07:59
|
Posts: 101 |
Thanked: 29 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
|
#1355
|
|
2011-02-14
, 08:02
|
Posts: 992 |
Thanked: 995 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ California
|
#1356
|
You can't be further from the truth. Maemo is in almost every way different than Android, they are similar only by the name of their kernel, and even then Google stripped out a lot of the one going into Androids making it increasingly difficult to upstream.
N900 was never mentioned to be a flagship
Android does not support GPU acceleration (it will, eventually, they keep putting it off for each new version). Of course, they'll conveniently say that the manufacturers should include their optimizations all by themselves if they want to accelerate their UIs... like those exist for video accelleration and then there would be no problem.
|
2011-02-14
, 08:13
|
|
Posts: 1,079 |
Thanked: 1,019 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#1357
|
Is this Nokia speaking or MS?
Nokia: 'Our first priority is beating Android'
|
2011-02-14
, 08:14
|
Posts: 992 |
Thanked: 738 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Low Earth Orbit
|
#1358
|
My favorite commentary was ... because ... this calmly listed all the strengths and advantages of Nokia phone hardware and explained all the strengths and advantages of WP7 software (which I wasn't familiar with before).
# Windows Phone 7 is amazingly fast and responsive while also being unique
# Windows Phone 7 is rock solid stable and after using it since July 2010 I can confirm it is the MOST stable mobile operating system I have ever used
# Windows Phone 7 gaming rocks, Zune is fantastic, multiple Exchange support is solid, Office integration is great, and developers are building apps
# Email on Symbian blows, but on Windows Phone 7 it absolutely rocks and I prefer to use my WP7 smartphone for email handling over even my Outlook desktop client
|
2011-02-14
, 08:17
|
|
Posts: 3,397 |
Thanked: 1,212 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Netherlands
|
#1359
|
On the same hardware - no way. No matter how good VM you build, no matter how optimized its JIT pathways are, you can't beat native execution.
Of course, they'll conveniently say that the manufacturers should include their optimizations all by themselves if they want to accelerate their UIs, but that is just to mask the original problem - that Android is still just a glorified virtual machine. GPU acceleration hooks should exist in gfx drivers (just like those exist for video acceleration), and then there would be no problem, but that makes writing drivers longer and would require a good revamp of the Dalvik stack which Google seems to put off for years now.
|
2011-02-14
, 08:18
|
Posts: 2,829 |
Thanked: 1,459 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Finland
|
#1360
|
Tags |
bye-nokia, i don't even, just shoot him, just shoot me, let's elope, lockdown, meego?fail, negatron dan, nokia defiled, nokia suicide, sell tulips, step 8 out of 5, the-end?, www.elop.org |
Thread Tools | |
|
(Android actually runs faster then Maemo. But some manufacturers choose run graphic without acceleration due to CPU price list and software development efforts and that choice requires a fast CPU without any GPU)