Active Topics
-
The N900 is now 15 years old! (9)
to Nokia N900 by Arno_11 - 9 hrs ago -
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (4)
to SailfishOS by Maemish - 5 days, 21 hrs ago - more...
|
2013-09-17
, 15:32
|
|
Posts: 466 |
Thanked: 661 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
|
#132
|
Originally Posted by juiceme
Which toolchain do you build with?
Well I'd say nothing can go wrong but usually just saying it is prone to trigger the impossible...
But really, nothing should go wrong.
And all other kernels boot correctly, right?
Are you sure you do not have something non-standard I might have overlooked, I do remember you had some extra partitioning there, maybe something else too?
I saw this in the kernel-plus topic:
The kernel builds properly when using Sabermod's Linaro GCC 4.8 cross-compile toolchain for ARM EABI.
It doesn't boot, though.
NON-Linaro information:
I've recently picked up a spare N9 (smashed screen, though) hwrev 1607, and K+ boots just as often as Harmattan on it.
On hwrev 1507, it just hangs at kexec. Finicky.
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...4&postcount=77
| The Following User Says Thank You to jackburton For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2013-09-17
, 18:56
|
|
Community Council |
Posts: 4,920 |
Thanked: 12,867 times |
Joined on May 2012
@ Southerrn Finland
|
#133
|
Originally Posted by jackburton
When I compile ubiboot kernels I am using the Linaro 4.6.3 arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc compiler. However, Harmattan kernels I build in the traditional scratchbox environment;
Which toolchain do you build with?
I saw this in the kernel-plus topic:
The kernel builds properly when using Sabermod's Linaro GCC 4.8 cross-compile toolchain for ARM EABI.
[sbox-HARMATTAN_ARMEL: /usr/src/kernel-2.6.32_plus_nat_extfat] > gcc --version
sbox-arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc ('cs2009q3-hard-67-sb16') 4.4.1
Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
[sbox-HARMATTAN_ARMEL: /usr/src/kernel-2.6.32_plus_nat_extfat] >
Originally Posted by jackburton
Well, I have found out th hard way that HWREV really makes the difference. Some devices take almost anything, like my trusty 1501, and some are so-so, and need to boot several times just to get a kernel running (if even then...?)
I've recently picked up a spare N9 (smashed screen, though) hwrev 1607, and K+ boots just as often as Harmattan on it.
On hwrev 1507, it just hangs at kexec. Finicky.
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...4&postcount=77
| The Following User Says Thank You to juiceme For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2013-09-17
, 19:19
|
|
Posts: 4,118 |
Thanked: 8,901 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ Ruhrgebiet, Germany
|
#134
|
Mine is 1601 (normally boots everything...).
--
).
Last edited by peterleinchen; 2013-09-18 at 07:23.
--
Originally Posted by jackburton
So, I am not alone (at least
...
On hwrev 1507, it just hangs at kexec. Finicky.
).
__________________
SIM-Switcher, automated SIM switching with a Double (Dual) SIM adapter
--
Thank you all for voting me into the Community Council 2014-2016!
Please consider your membership / supporting Maemo e.V. and help to spread this by following/copying this link to your TMO signature:
[MC eV] Maemo Community eV membership application, http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=94257
editsignature, http://talk.maemo.org/profile.php?do=editsignature
SIM-Switcher, automated SIM switching with a Double (Dual) SIM adapter
--
Thank you all for voting me into the Community Council 2014-2016!
Please consider your membership / supporting Maemo e.V. and help to spread this by following/copying this link to your TMO signature:
[MC eV] Maemo Community eV membership application, http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=94257
editsignature, http://talk.maemo.org/profile.php?do=editsignature
Last edited by peterleinchen; 2013-09-18 at 07:23.
|
|
2013-09-18
, 05:08
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 5,320 |
Thanked: 4,464 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#135
|
Why on earth are some revs so picky, can that be overcome eventually?
|
|
2013-09-18
, 06:55
|
|
Community Council |
Posts: 4,920 |
Thanked: 12,867 times |
Joined on May 2012
@ Southerrn Finland
|
#136
|
Originally Posted by jalyst
Well I don't know that for sure, if I did it wouldn't be such a problem any longer, would it?
Why on earth are some revs so picky, can that be overcome eventually?
The problems are all with getting Harmattan starting up correctlly. With Nitdroid or Nemo it's trivial, those can run on any HWREV with no problem whatsoever. Harmattan is exceedingly picky, bordering on fragile on how it starts up...
What I suspect is different HWREV boards have a bit different components/chipset/firmware and of course when Nokia made it they tested/debugged all with their official kernel and tuned the bootchain accordingly in each PR release.
I have no luxury like this, with my own device (rev.1501) I can do what I can to tune it but support on other HWREVs is not so easy.
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to juiceme For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2013-09-18
, 07:27
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 5,320 |
Thanked: 4,464 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#137
|
Originally Posted by juiceme
True, it was a rhetorical Qn more than anything else
Well I don't know that for sure, if I did it wouldn't be such a problem any longer, would it?
| The Following User Says Thank You to jalyst For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2013-09-18
, 11:29
|
|
Posts: 466 |
Thanked: 661 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
|
#138
|
So strange. I am using kernel-plus with nat binary download. On first flash, everything was fine. Later, it seemed my bluetooth tethering just wouldn't work (couldn't connect second device). I rebooted. Then it went into a reboot loop. I was freaked out. Then I just let it sit for a minute and eventually it did boot. I'm still running it now. However I experience issues with reboots. Not sure if the plus patches have really bought me anything here other than more random instability.
Anyone care to comment regarding stability?
I could compile plus myself on device and see if that somehow makes a difference.
Anyone care to comment regarding stability?
I could compile plus myself on device and see if that somehow makes a difference.
| The Following User Says Thank You to jackburton For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2013-09-18
, 11:51
|
|
Community Council |
Posts: 4,920 |
Thanked: 12,867 times |
Joined on May 2012
@ Southerrn Finland
|
#139
|
Originally Posted by jackburton
I have been running on the plus kernel since I compiled it, something like 2 weeks ago and then with the extfat-patched kernel for about a week or so.
Not sure if the plus patches have really bought me anything here other than more random instability.
Anyone care to comment regarding stability?
Not once have I encountered any random instability. Granted, I do not overclock my device and have only fairly light tweaks on it, just basic Open Mode stuff.
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to juiceme For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2013-09-18
, 12:16
|
|
Posts: 2,021 |
Thanked: 1,060 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Hong Kong
|
#140
|
@juiceme have you test the exfat yet?
and can optimizer include it?
The Glorious Lady T.Mavica
Twitter https://twitter.com/TMavica