Closed Thread
Thread Tools
Posts: 97 | Thanked: 41 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#1391
Originally Posted by Sphinx780 View Post
How soon is your iphonoe firmware update coming? is there a speculation thread for it as well?
My firmware is rock solid stable as far as I've seen. Can do a load more than the N900 can do too, a lot less fiddly!
 
Posts: 1,667 | Thanked: 561 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#1392
Originally Posted by berty View Post
My firmware is rock solid stable as far as I've seen. Can do a load more than the N900 can do too, a lot less fiddly!
why should we care about your ipod?
 
Posts: 248 | Thanked: 43 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ US
#1393
Originally Posted by berty View Post
My firmware is rock solid stable as far as I've seen. Can do a load more than the N900 can do too, a lot less fiddly!
Hahahaha Just admit you still missed your N900.... poor thing. Go tell that to your iphone fanboy.
 
Posts: 120 | Thanked: 69 times | Joined on Nov 2007 @ NL
#1394
Originally Posted by berty View Post
My firmware is rock solid stable as far as I've seen. Can do a load more than the N900 can do too, a lot less fiddly!
You have an iPhone now but keep spamming this forum with useless posts? Is your new toy not entertaining enough?
 
Posts: 100 | Thanked: 18 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Bristol, UK
#1395
Dont you dare compare that useless mobile with n900!
 
skalogre's Avatar
Posts: 327 | Thanked: 249 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Λεμεσιανός, ρε!
#1396
Originally Posted by flexmat View Post
I laugh if pr 1.2 still has bugs.
Can you make it any more apparent that you're clueless about software development? I mean, really....

I will quote myself, AGAIN:

Look at it this way. With any major project (especially hardware/software) there will always be issues/defects. ALWAYS. Things aren't shipped when they are "bug free" - they are shipped when there is reasonable confidence that the major issues have been identified and fixed or deemed low impact. I'd rather a company be honest and delay something a little rather than chuck it out the door with what may possibly be serious defects.

What would happen to the device's reputation and future sales if they prematurely sent it out the door knowing there is a possibility of something going horribly wrong? Look at the guest account issue with the latest version of OS X, for instance. Some more exposure to beta testers may have very well exposed that issue, who knows; yet obviously the decision was made to release it. It is also quite likely that some people in Apple's release management team were aware of it and decided that it is not that likely end users would follow that scenario.
 
matts76's Avatar
Posts: 324 | Thanked: 201 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ UK
#1397
my girlfriend has an iphone and while i might pick it up a couple of times a week to play a game (when she has my n900), she is on mine all the time because her iphone is just too slow in comparison for web browsing
 
Posts: 15 | Thanked: 6 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#1398
Originally Posted by skalogre View Post
Can you make it any more apparent that you're clueless about software development? I mean, really....

I will quote myself, AGAIN:

Look at it this way. With any major project (especially hardware/software) there will always be issues/defects. ALWAYS. Things aren't shipped when they are "bug free" - they are shipped when there is reasonable confidence that the major issues have been identified and fixed or deemed low impact. I'd rather a company be honest and delay something a little rather than chuck it out the door with what may possibly be serious defects.

What would happen to the device's reputation and future sales if they prematurely sent it out the door knowing there is a possibility of something going horribly wrong? Look at the guest account issue with the latest version of OS X, for instance. Some more exposure to beta testers may have very well exposed that issue, who knows; yet obviously the decision was made to release it. It is also quite likely that some people in Apple's release management team were aware of it and decided that it is not that likely end users would follow that scenario.
See my post 1421.It's normal for you to give us an OS with lots of bugs (pr 1.0)?
 
Posts: 1,729 | Thanked: 388 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Canada
#1399
i saw this topic about PR 1.2 at MaemoBriefs and its totally awesome!!!

As i update my n900's firmware, i see only minor changes, and i first thought that PR 1.2 will be the same but i am wrong and glad to be wrong!

so many changes! looking forward to it!

EDIT: oops! i saw it in nokia labs, not MaemoBriefs....
 
skalogre's Avatar
Posts: 327 | Thanked: 249 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Λεμεσιανός, ρε!
#1400
Originally Posted by flexmat View Post
See my post 1421.It's normal for you to give us an OS with lots of bugs (pr 1.0)?


You just made it even more apparent that you have no idea. Read again what I wrote.

P.s. I didn't realise I gave you an OS. if I did, give it back, it's mine.

Edit:

WTF is wrong with me even reading this thread?
 
Closed Thread

Tags
avoid thread, fictional update, firmware, fremantle, future, goodwin's law, it will be on 12.21.2012, maemo, maemo 5, may be it's a myth?, may be next week, maybe april fools, maybe not, patience is a virtue, patience wastes your life, post generator, pr 1.2, pr1.2, product release, repost, rerun, rick roll'd, speculation, update, worst thread ever

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:50.