|
2009-01-14
, 03:28
|
|
Posts: 900 |
Thanked: 273 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Fresno CA USA
|
#142
|
|
2009-01-14
, 03:55
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#143
|
|
2009-01-14
, 05:02
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 7,109 |
Thanked: 8,820 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
#144
|
Well that's a different issue, and one that I'm not entirely certain about myself.
It worked fine for the rest of the Canadian discount code recipients.
|
2009-01-14
, 07:47
|
Posts: 631 |
Thanked: 1,123 times |
Joined on Sep 2005
@ Helsinki
|
#145
|
Some applications benefit greatly from a minimal set of funtion keys. Do you for example wish to give up screen real estate in the browser. How about not having a key to be used as a shutter release or when a bit of command line work is required. Each type of input facility has a value. I think some of the concern is based on the posibilty that ssyetm function and usability will be lost by arificialy limiting controls so that the marketing department can make a big deal out of touch. The original Mac had no function keys -- they all do now. How about loosing the facility of right click so some fool can brag on the simplicity of a one button mouse. I use the mouse as an example not because we need one on a handheld tablet.
|
2009-01-14
, 08:26
|
|
Posts: 3,105 |
Thanked: 11,088 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Mountain View (CA, USA)
|
#146
|
|
2009-01-14
, 12:57
|
|
Posts: 794 |
Thanked: 784 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ /Canada/Ontario/GTA
|
#147
|
|
2009-01-15
, 20:54
|
|
Posts: 2,427 |
Thanked: 2,986 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#148
|
The Following User Says Thank You to daperl For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-01-15
, 21:03
|
Posts: 5,335 |
Thanked: 8,187 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Pennsylvania, USA
|
#149
|
|
2009-01-15
, 21:15
|
|
Posts: 2,853 |
Thanked: 968 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
|
#150
|
Tags |
fremantle, iphone killer, n900, rover, rx-51 |
Thread Tools | |
|
Ryan Abel