|
2010-06-17
, 17:20
|
|
Posts: 4,930 |
Thanked: 2,272 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#142
|
Unless you are proficient in C/C++ and are compiling from source writing apps then well done, if on the other hand you are only pissing around in terminal editing scripts then your l33t hacking skills = fail
PS where is the freedom in Nokias closed binaries ????
The Following User Says Thank You to Benson For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-06-17
, 18:03
|
Posts: 446 |
Thanked: 79 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#143
|
PS safari ease of use pwns firefox on N900, really quick and simple to use, N900 web browsing is like cleaning your b*lls with sandpaper....very, very painful, its the lack of multi touch that really kills it imho, and personally flash should be binned, who in their right minds wants that bloated buggy
|
2010-06-17
, 18:32
|
Posts: 1,082 |
Thanked: 1,235 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
|
#144
|
sand paper balls LOL thats hilarious. help me uderstand. is it the lack of multi touch that makes gives it the sand paper sensation? and if so, please explain. i thought multi touch for internet was basically just pinch to zoom type stuff. is the absence of pinch to zoom really that serious?
|
2010-06-17
, 18:38
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#145
|
|
2010-06-17
, 19:10
|
|
Posts: 857 |
Thanked: 362 times |
Joined on Feb 2009
@ London
|
#146
|
I don't get why we need mulitouch either. I find it unnecessary unless you want to type on a touchscreen (who really wants to type on a touchscreen a physical keyboard is much better really I prefer the feel of real buttons) or you want to zoom but tap to zoom works pretty well on the Nokia n900 and so does the swirl gesture. So do we really need multitouch it doesn't actually make browsing better contrary to what Apple fanboys say.
|
2010-06-17
, 19:13
|
Posts: 1,667 |
Thanked: 561 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#147
|
The Following User Says Thank You to nosa101 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-06-17
, 19:17
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#148
|
|
2010-06-17
, 19:21
|
|
Posts: 857 |
Thanked: 362 times |
Joined on Feb 2009
@ London
|
#149
|
|
2010-06-17
, 19:27
|
|
Posts: 431 |
Thanked: 239 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ London
|
#150
|
Tags |
this is so sad |
Thread Tools | |
|
You've already given up and run from the least restrictive to the most restrictive, so I'm a little confused as to your point. If you think that's fine, so be it, but don't get on our case for disagreeing with you.