Active Topics
-
The N900 is now 15 years old! (9)
to Nokia N900 by Arno_11 - 11 hrs, 55 mins ago -
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (4)
to SailfishOS by Maemish - 6 days ago - more...
| The Following User Says Thank You to Seker_94 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-09-24
, 15:37
|
|
Posts: 41 |
Thanked: 13 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Australia
|
#142
|
Originally Posted by don_falcone
there is a package called busybox-power which supports priority for swap.
Thanks for that bit. Is there a way that busybox' swapon would include swap priorities in a future update? That way we could omit the swapoff/swapon workaround.
EDIT: There's the mount package, supportingly with priority support for swap.
EDIT2: Said mount package has unmet python dependencies on my device. Bummer.
|
|
2011-09-24
, 15:49
|
|
Posts: 159 |
Thanked: 68 times |
Joined on Sep 2011
@ India
|
#143
|
pls tell me that why compcache is better than swap memory as in compressing process cpu requires some time and doesn't that make phone operation slow...?
| The Following User Says Thank You to knobby For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-09-24
, 16:00
|
|
Posts: 105 |
Thanked: 49 times |
Joined on Jul 2011
|
#144
|
i didn't have any better performance with compcache
but reboots many reboots
@knobby
@seker_94
don't give sh|t about COMPCACHE
if you want extra performance just use speedpatch
but reboots many reboots
@knobby
@seker_94
don't give sh|t about COMPCACHE
if you want extra performance just use speedpatch
|
|
2011-09-24
, 17:00
|
|
Posts: 1,101 |
Thanked: 1,184 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Spain
|
#145
|
Originally Posted by Seker_94
Question has no meaning. Use compcache if you want, if you don't want to use it, it doesn't affect you.
bumping -_-
i have a single question
Does COMPCACHE effect our n900 or it doesn't?
Originally Posted by knobby
It is much more complex than that. Compressing a page takes noticeable cpu, but decompressing is very fast. On the other hand, mmc also takes a fair amount of cpu, and it can be very slow or fast depending on the hardware controller, and the pattern of usage (unaligned writes for example). In the N8x0 , the mmc is rather slow, and even having a much slower cpu than the N900, compcache is a very noticeable gain.
pls tell me that why compcache is better than swap memory as in compressing process cpu requires some time and doesn't that make phone operation slow...?
Compcache is kernel development, so it is not a trivial thing, and there are still issues to be resolved in the N900. Until they are, the real gain can't be assessed.
Originally Posted by Mohammad
This is a thread for the development of compcache for the N900.
i didn't have any better performance with compcache
but reboots many reboots
@knobby
@seker_94
don't give sh|t about COMPCACHE
if you want extra performance just use speedpatch
Please don't pollute this thread with senseless chatter. That script you refer to isn't a patch and doesn't affect performance in any way.
|
|
2011-09-24
, 17:34
|
|
Posts: 159 |
Thanked: 68 times |
Joined on Sep 2011
@ India
|
#146
|
Originally Posted by maacruz
i agree with u ... but since mmc of n900 is quite large and moreover swapping to mmc is quite fast as compared to other nseries tablets and cpu is also better than them, and whats the idea of introducing compcache...?
Question has no meaning. Use compcache if you want, if you don't want to use it, it doesn't affect you.
It is much more complex than that. Compressing a page takes noticeable cpu, but decompressing is very fast. On the other hand, mmc also takes a fair amount of cpu, and it can be very slow or fast depending on the hardware controller, and the pattern of usage (unaligned writes for example). In the N8x0 , the mmc is rather slow, and even having a much slower cpu than the N900, compcache is a very noticeable gain.
Compcache is kernel development, so it is not a trivial thing, and there are still issues to be resolved in the N900. Until they are, the real gain can't be assessed.
This is a thread for the development of compcache for the N900.
Please don't pollute this thread with senseless chatter. That script you refer to isn't a patch and doesn't affect performance in any way.
|
|
2011-09-24
, 17:47
|
|
Posts: 1,680 |
Thanked: 3,685 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
|
#147
|
Originally Posted by Mohammad
It is better to be thought a noob than to post and prove it.
i didn't have any better performance with compcache
but reboots many reboots
@knobby
@seker_94
don't give sh|t about COMPCACHE
if you want extra performance just use speedpatch
__________________
N900: One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die.
| The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to vi_ For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-09-24
, 19:00
|
|
Posts: 1,101 |
Thanked: 1,184 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Spain
|
#148
|
Originally Posted by knobby
Yes, it surprised me how well the internal mmc and the swap partition in the N900 behaves. I guess they have added a much better controller in the N900, with several buffers, to get that performance.
i agree with u ... but since mmc of n900 is quite large and moreover swapping to mmc is quite fast as compared to other nseries tablets and cpu is also better than them, and whats the idea of introducing compcache...?
Anyway, I think it is worth trying compcache, and if we don't try, we'll never know. From the ramzswap stats in my N810, after hte initial phase, most swap usage is reading and not writing, so it is possible that we can get significant gains in the N900 too.
|
|
2011-09-24
, 20:14
|
|
Posts: 178 |
Thanked: 91 times |
Joined on May 2011
@ Mira (Venice) - Italy
|
#149
|
Hi after appliy this mod can I use proposed Swappolube values or I need something new?
Sorry for my bad english, I'm italian...
Sorry for my bad english, I'm italian...
|
|
2011-09-25
, 08:43
|
|
Posts: 41 |
Thanked: 13 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Australia
|
#150
|
i am using a disksize of 65536
and have my swap of about 750mb on my micro sd card,
both with the same swap priority.
for me anything above 64mb causes the massive lag experienced by a few people.
thanks freemangordon for all youve done so far.
and have my swap of about 750mb on my micro sd card,
both with the same swap priority.
for me anything above 64mb causes the massive lag experienced by a few people.
thanks freemangordon for all youve done so far.
i have a single question
Does COMPCACHE effect our n900 or it doesn't?