|
2011-03-23
, 09:27
|
Posts: 255 |
Thanked: 107 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
|
#152
|
|
2011-03-23
, 09:49
|
|
Posts: 1,637 |
Thanked: 4,424 times |
Joined on Apr 2009
@ Germany
|
#153
|
|
2011-03-23
, 09:53
|
Posts: 255 |
Thanked: 107 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
|
#154
|
|
2011-03-23
, 12:16
|
Posts: 515 |
Thanked: 259 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#155
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to geohsia For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-03-23
, 12:49
|
|
Posts: 1,637 |
Thanked: 4,424 times |
Joined on Apr 2009
@ Germany
|
#156
|
|
2011-03-23
, 14:22
|
Posts: 650 |
Thanked: 497 times |
Joined on Oct 2008
@ Ghent, Belgium
|
#157
|
|
2011-03-23
, 14:48
|
Posts: 1,378 |
Thanked: 1,604 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Göteborg, Sweden
|
#158
|
|
2011-03-23
, 15:52
|
Posts: 515 |
Thanked: 259 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#159
|
The Following User Says Thank You to geohsia For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-03-23
, 23:01
|
|
Posts: 1,637 |
Thanked: 4,424 times |
Joined on Apr 2009
@ Germany
|
#160
|
It is difficult to really compare side by side unless I am able to set options manually ISO (> 400) and shutter speed.
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to nicolai For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
camera-ui, fremantle |
Thread Tools | |
|
Camera-UI2 can't seem to go higher than ISO 800. Strangely FCAM RAW files have less noise. The noise at around ISO 3000 (FCAM) is easier to manage than ISO 800 (Camera-UI2). It is difficult to really compare side by side unless I am able to set options manually ISO (> 400) and shutter speed. I will try to profile the Camera-UI2 output and see if that makes a difference.
The OOTC JPEGS still seems to be the best. I wonder if it does some dark frame subtraction.