The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-09-21
, 08:53
|
Posts: 2,102 |
Thanked: 1,937 times |
Joined on Sep 2008
@ Berlin, Germany
|
#1622
|
Let me simplify my problem. I am unable to deinstall kernel-power.
returnsCode:sudo gainroot apt-get install --reinstall -y kernel kernel-flasher
When I try to do it automatically with Nokia Kernel, I get the following message:
Yes, I am connected to the internet. Application Manager is not running. I've tried with usb connection, ac connection, and no connection. Battery is full.
[1|root@Nokia-N900|~]apt-get install --reinstall -dy kernel kernel-flasher
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 2 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 5 not upgraded.
Need to get 1889kB/2046kB of archives.
After this operation, 0B of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 https://downloads.maemo.nokia.com ./ kernel 2.6.28-20103103+0m5 [1889kB]
Fetched 1889kB in 30s (61,4kB/s)
Download complete and in download only mode
|
2011-09-21
, 09:07
|
Posts: 1,808 |
Thanked: 4,272 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Germany
|
#1623
|
Using 500 mhz as minimum is more "productive" in terms of powersaving and avoiding wear on CPU (although, the second effect is probably very little). When You're using 500 mhz as min, Your CPU spend much more time @ 0 mhz during idle (every second, it's sitting ~2x longer at 0 mhz, after doing task @ 500 mhz), so you got additional benefit of saving on power leakage.
so, probably it's not about harm, but additional benefit It's also possible, that he doesn't have idea of power leakage etc, just like to have 500 mhz as starting point
|
2011-09-21
, 10:53
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#1624
|
|
2011-09-21
, 11:00
|
|
Posts: 2,021 |
Thanked: 1,060 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Hong Kong
|
#1625
|
|
2011-09-21
, 11:44
|
Posts: 3,074 |
Thanked: 12,960 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Sofia,Bulgaria
|
#1626
|
|
2011-09-21
, 12:12
|
Posts: 2,154 |
Thanked: 8,464 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#1628
|
|
2011-09-21
, 12:12
|
Posts: 41 |
Thanked: 13 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Australia
|
#1629
|
We've discussed this issue just a few pages ago in this thread, although in the end it wasn't clear even if the problem existed at all.
Can you "prove" that your CPU is actually going down to 125Mhz, or is that merely the output of "kernel-config show".
If the frequency is being avoided, it doesn't matter if the minimum is set to that frequency. Check with e.g. conky and see how low the CPU goes with nothing else running (or use powertop if you know how to).
AFAIK most people avoid 125Mhz but allow 250Mhz, which doesn't seem to harm. Why do you need to avoid both 125 and 250?
The Following User Says Thank You to werks For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-09-21
, 12:32
|
|
Posts: 2,021 |
Thanked: 1,060 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Hong Kong
|
#1630
|
Tags |
battery-status, bq27x00_battery, kernel, kernel-power, misiak4king, noobs-cant-read, pali4president, patches, readdirections, revolverspinyou |
Thread Tools | |
|
so, probably it's not about harm, but additional benefit It's also possible, that he doesn't have idea of power leakage etc, just like to have 500 mhz as starting point
N900's aluminum backcover / body replacement
-
N900's HDMI-Out
-
Camera cover MOD
-
Measure battery's real capacity on-device
-
TrueCrypt 7.1 | ereswap | bnf
-
Hardware's mods research is costly. To support my work, please consider donating. Thank You!