Reply
Thread Tools
anidel's Avatar
Posts: 1,743 | Thanked: 1,231 times | Joined on Jul 2006 @ Twickenham, UK
#161
Originally Posted by vvaz View Post
Hmm. "yet" applies to IT or iPhone?
:-D

To IT
 
Posts: 874 | Thanked: 316 times | Joined on Jun 2007 @ London UK
#162
No, that equates to 100,000 people with Macs
And/or 100,000 iphone owners

Also this article leads us to a thought that maybe some of the people are getting the SDK for the new beta 2.0(1.2) firmware...
I am not an Apple or iPhone owner but the more that becomes revealed about this the more the "amazing... Wow" title of the thread is justified.

Does this give the iPhone, to all practical intents and purposes, the capability equivalent to Open Source.

Obviously Apple couldn't give a rat's elbow about potential competition from Nokia, but maybe it has an eye over it's shoulder at the upcoming competition from the Intel MID's.

To quote this commentator
http://www.gottabemobile.com/Video+O...+M528+MID.aspx

"Something is happening behind Intel's Atom branding that's more than just silicon development. There's a software infrastructure building that is big, financially supported and not far removed from the way Apple are doing things with the iPhone. The control is there. The guidelines are there. The restricted hardware set is there. The ISV process seems to be both accessible and well controlled and with 150 people working on the Moblin core and distribution through partners like Canonical and Asianux who are also working on optimisations and UI, you know there's some big numbers involved."
 
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#163
Originally Posted by vvaz View Post
Hmm. "yet" applies to IT or iPhone?
It certainly could.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 
Benson's Avatar
Posts: 4,930 | Thanked: 2,272 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#164
Originally Posted by Rebski View Post
Does this give the iPhone, to all practical intents and purposes, the capability equivalent to Open Source.
Not the equivalent of a gnu-like system; while you can have open source iPhone apps, you can't (from what I hear) replace any part of existing system software. Some classes of applications are also practically impossible with the SDK.

I'd say it's more like capability equivalent to JavaME hype; that is, what JavaME was supposed to bring before it became so hard to make things run well on diverse phones.
 
Posts: 356 | Thanked: 231 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#165
Originally Posted by Rebski View Post
Obviously Apple couldn't give a rat's elbow about potential competition from Nokia, but maybe it has an eye over it's shoulder at the upcoming competition from the Intel MID's.
I think people usually forgot proportions in SJ's RDF

That is Nokia which "couldn't give a rat's elbow about potential competition from Apple". Nokia has over 40% of world mobile market. Numbers from few weeks ago showed that N95 alone sold more items than iPhone. And N95 is only *one* model of smartphone from Nokia's quite deep and wide shelf in that segment.

Last edited by vvaz; 2008-03-12 at 20:29. Reason: s/Nokia/Apple/ in quote - Nokia doesn't compete with itself? :)
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to vvaz For This Useful Post:
Posts: 344 | Thanked: 26 times | Joined on Jan 2007
#166
Originally Posted by vvaz View Post
I think people usually forgot proportions in SJ's RDF

That is Nokia which "couldn't give a rat's elbow about potential competition from Apple". Nokia has over 40% of world mobile market. Numbers from few weeks ago showed that N95 alone sold more items than iPhone. And N95 is only *one* model of smartphone from Nokia's quite deep and wide shelf in that segment.
There is no doubt Nokia sells a crap ton of S60 devices Whats funny is that people aren't using the features on them. I know a few girls with N75's here in the US and they have NO idea what the hell S60 is or that they can install apps. To them its just a camera phone and they paid extra for the bigger screen. Its poorly marketed and very confusing for them. These girls all loaded the browser once or twice and just gave up because it was a pain in the *** to use. They pick my iPhone up and they are on Facebook in 5 seconds.

Apple has 2% of the worldwide smartphone market and it has 50 times the web traffic than any other mobile. Google assumed it was an error and had their engineers recheck the data. Haha!

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/667f13de-da6...0779fd2ac.html

Goes to show you that software design is everything. Apple's opportunity here is that they can sell services that people want. Having an AppStore and iTunes Store right there without any configuration is so great. This simply isn't there on any Nokia device S60 or Maemo.

A few taps and you're in a catalog of 3rd party apps. No dependencies, repositories... or digging in your settings to find some setting to allow apps without certificates to install since nothing is really certified. S60 and Maemo are way behind Apple's delivery platform.
 
Benson's Avatar
Posts: 4,930 | Thanked: 2,272 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#167
Originally Posted by sherifnix View Post
There is no doubt Nokia sells a crap ton of S60 devices Whats funny is that people aren't using the features on them. I know a few girls with N75's here in the US and they have NO idea what the hell S60 is or that they can install apps. To them its just a camera phone and they paid extra for the bigger screen. Its poorly marketed and very confusing for them. These girls all loaded the browser once or twice and just gave up because it was a pain in the *** to use. They pick my iPhone up and they are on Facebook in 5 seconds.

Apple has 2% of the worldwide smartphone market and it has 50 times the web traffic than any other mobile. Google assumed it was an error and had their engineers recheck the data. Haha!

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/667f13de-da6...0779fd2ac.html

Goes to show you that software design is everything. Apple's opportunity here is that they can sell services that people want. Having an AppStore and iTunes Store right there without any configuration is so great. This simply isn't there on any Nokia device S60 or Maemo.

A few taps and you're in a catalog of 3rd party apps. No dependencies, repositories... or digging in your settings to find some setting to allow apps without certificates to install since nothing is really certified. S60 and Maemo are way behind Apple's delivery platform.
Interesting, but in a way, it reminds me of the classic "Is Linux ready for the desktop" news article / blog post. My response is usually to yell at the monitor:
"Who gives a hoot if it's ready for the desktop?! It does what I want it to.
No, on second thought, may it never be ready for the desktop. O Great Modem in the Sky, spare us the torment of n00bish legions who know naught, and yet strive to know less!"

They pick up an iPhone, and in 5 seconds, they're on facebook. They should all buy iPhones. All the smart, or rather computer-competent, people should buy NITs and S60 phones. That'll keep the itT forums sane.

While it's interesting to see iPhones getting far more than their share of use for Google sources, it'd be interesting to see how other devices stack up in terms of googles/month/device sold. I think the N8x0s, even with their limited connectivity, would likely beat them. The iPhone is marketed heavily as an internet device, unlike most smartphones. The NITs are, too, and so a comparison would be interesting. Of course, unless Nokia is publishing sales figures of N800s, we probably can't see any such results.
 
Posts: 874 | Thanked: 316 times | Joined on Jun 2007 @ London UK
#168
That is Nokia which "couldn't give a rat's elbow about potential competition from Apple". Nokia has over 40% of world mobile market. Numbers from few weeks ago showed that N95 alone sold more items than iPhone. And N95 is only *one* model of smartphone from Nokia's quite deep and wide shelf in that segment.
My remarks were made in the context of the discussion in this thread, i.e. iPhone vs Nokia Internet Tablet.

In what way could Apple be interested in anything that Nokia is doing with these devices?

Come to think of it, I find it hard to see that even Nokia is much interested either.
 
brontide's Avatar
Posts: 868 | Thanked: 474 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Capital District, NY, USA
#169
Originally Posted by sherifnix View Post
Its poorly marketed and very confusing for them. These girls all loaded the browser once or twice and just gave up because it was a pain in the *** to use. They pick my iPhone up and they are on Facebook in 5 seconds.
So the rest of the Nokia products get the same crappy marketing and UI treatment as the NIT's.
 
Posts: 21 | Thanked: 4 times | Joined on Mar 2008
#170
Originally Posted by sherifnix View Post
Goes to show you that software design is everything. Apple's opportunity here is that they can sell services that people want. Having an AppStore and iTunes Store right there without any configuration is so great. This simply isn't there on any Nokia device S60 or Maemo.

A few taps and you're in a catalog of 3rd party apps. No dependencies, repositories... or digging in your settings to find some setting to allow apps without certificates to install since nothing is really certified. S60 and Maemo are way behind Apple's delivery platform.
Uhh hows that any different to this

http://maemo.org/downloads/OS2008/

you go there on n8*0 click the click to install button and OMG it installs no hassles, it was so hard. Difference is you do not have to get apps from there, you can go to other maemo apps sites, no lock in.

Apples service is not free, you have to pay a fee to get apps hosted, plus they will take 30% of what ever you sell.

They will have no dependencies because every app will be standalone due to restrictions placed on the SDK, of no app being allowed to run in the background and no app being allowed to run another app.
 
Reply

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:48.