![]() |
2008-10-09
, 19:12
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#172
|
![]() |
2008-10-09
, 19:19
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#173
|
Yes, changing resolutions is rather tricky. Take iPhone with 320x480 for instance. Changing the resolution for the next HW would then basically break the current 3rd party applications (or at least make them look bad) - especially since they still don't have resolution independence and are drawing their stuff using bitmaps.
![]() |
2008-10-09
, 19:24
|
|
Posts: 274 |
Thanked: 62 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Helotes, TX
|
#174
|
Device constraints != screen constraints; it's been suggested an N810-size platform could handle a 5" screen, and an N800-size definitely could.
You can make them even crisper than they are, you can make fonts smaller (although you can right now, too; resolution's not limiting on this at present) and in fact you can make gui elements smaller, at the cost of having to use the stylus; this is useful for ported apps.
And there are too many things designed around pixel spacings (notably on the web) that would be usable fit to the N8x0 display's size, but demand more pixels.
I think on a 5" screen, going as far as 1280x800 is the threshold of usefulness; anything over that probably won't help. But we're still way short of that.
![]() |
2008-10-09
, 19:30
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#175
|
![]() |
2008-10-09
, 19:31
|
|
Posts: 1,635 |
Thanked: 1,816 times |
Joined on Apr 2008
@ Manchester, England
|
#176
|
![]() |
2008-10-09
, 19:53
|
Posts: 2,152 |
Thanked: 1,490 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Czech Republic
|
#177
|
The maximum is either 400/133 (with no DSP tasks) or 330/220 (with any DSP tasks).
Performance simply keeps it at the same maximum; 400 without DSP, but dropping to 330 whenever there's a DSP task.
The Following User Says Thank You to fanoush For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2008-10-09
, 20:07
|
Posts: 631 |
Thanked: 1,123 times |
Joined on Sep 2005
@ Helsinki
|
#178
|
![]() |
2008-10-09
, 20:10
|
|
Posts: 1,635 |
Thanked: 1,816 times |
Joined on Apr 2008
@ Manchester, England
|
#179
|
![]() |
2008-10-09
, 20:16
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#180
|
ragnar, as far as you can tell so far, will we have access to all of the features of the omap3430, or do you simply not know yet?
The Following User Says Thank You to GeneralAntilles For This Useful Post: | ||
Last edited by ragnar; 2008-10-09 at 20:07.