felbutss
|
2010-04-09
, 07:26
|
|
Posts: 579 |
Thanked: 286 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Australia
|
#1871
|
|
2010-04-09
, 07:26
|
Posts: 1,224 |
Thanked: 1,763 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
|
#1872
|
Hmm... You should stick to the previous kernel that worked for you, at least for now, until Lehto/titan/Matan comes up with a better ulv kernel.
(I'm waiting for a 250-900 ulv kernel, like everyone else )
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Matan For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-04-09
, 07:31
|
Posts: 24 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#1873
|
|
2010-04-09
, 07:45
|
Posts: 273 |
Thanked: 113 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Germany
|
#1874
|
|
2010-04-09
, 07:51
|
Posts: 169 |
Thanked: 41 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Portugal
|
#1875
|
|
2010-04-09
, 08:09
|
|
Posts: 46 |
Thanked: 26 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Makati, Philippines
|
#1876
|
There is no "better ulv kernel". Each individual OMAP has its own lowest voltage in which it will work reliably at a given frequency.
TI only promise that 600MHz works at 1.35V (OPP5), but my device (and most others) also work at 1.2V (OPP3) - but some don't, and no kernel change will make them work. If you have such device, you can try 1.275V (OPP4) and probably some intermediate voltage levels. Similarly for other frequencies.
|
2010-04-09
, 08:10
|
|
Posts: 2,361 |
Thanked: 3,746 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Berlin - Love this city!!
|
#1877
|
|
2010-04-09
, 08:11
|
|
Posts: 664 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Australia
|
#1878
|
|
2010-04-09
, 08:16
|
Posts: 49 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Tn
|
#1879
|
|
2010-04-09
, 08:23
|
Posts: 72 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Finland
|
#1880
|
Thread Tools | |
|