|
2010-11-25
, 15:56
|
Posts: 156 |
Thanked: 239 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Finland
|
#1882
|
|
2010-11-25
, 18:18
|
Posts: 279 |
Thanked: 293 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Italy
|
#1883
|
|
2010-11-25
, 18:24
|
Posts: 1,729 |
Thanked: 388 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Canada
|
#1884
|
I'm one of the early adopters. Last night it broke even if i KNEW about this and treated with extreme care mini-usb.
Sent email to nokia care.
I'm ****ed....
|
2010-11-25
, 18:32
|
Posts: 279 |
Thanked: 293 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Italy
|
#1885
|
|
2010-11-25
, 20:04
|
Posts: 3,617 |
Thanked: 2,412 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Cambridge, UK
|
#1886
|
|
2010-11-29
, 16:54
|
Posts: 29 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Germany
|
#1887
|
|
2010-11-30
, 20:01
|
Posts: 17 |
Thanked: 6 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
@ Italy
|
#1888
|
|
2010-12-01
, 02:29
|
|
Posts: 518 |
Thanked: 334 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ italy
|
#1889
|
|
2010-12-01
, 09:36
|
Posts: 17 |
Thanked: 6 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
@ Italy
|
#1890
|
Tags |
bad design, broken, charging, failure, hardware, loose, microusb, microusb port, n900, nokia, part, port, repair, return, surface mount, usb, usb port, warranty |
Thread Tools | |
|
The springs in the micro-USB plug apply a force *inside* the socket, holding it in place.
Is the logic that this increases the force needed for insertion and removal?
It does not feel excessive to me, and because the socket is very low-profile, and snug to the board, the force transferred to the surface mount from normal insertion is small. And Nokia would have tested this with thousands of robotic insert/remove cycles.
I would be much more worried about sideways knocks to the plug while it is in the phone, e.g. from being dropped on a desk. The springs on the plug will make no difference to that.
BTW, older USB connectors have equivalent springs in the socket, but they can fail eventually, and its much easier to replace a cable.