The Following User Says Thank You to tissot For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-11-24
, 23:31
|
Posts: 474 |
Thanked: 283 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Oxford, UK
|
#182
|
You'd need to solve the problem of "how to render a page faster than a user could possibly scroll, no matter how insanely complex the page layout is".
Considering the power of the N900 browser (which everyone is raving about), don't you think it's fair to cut it some slack if it occasionally needs half a second to catch up with the rendering during wild scroll-rides?
|
2009-11-24
, 23:35
|
|
Posts: 415 |
Thanked: 193 times |
Joined on Jun 2009
@ A place with no mountains
|
#183
|
Here we go some real life scrolling in the browser, flash off.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8JeLKKfDDM
If you want a comparative iPhone vid I can do that too but I think it's pretty much self explanatory. I might cover the actual OS later.
|
2009-11-24
, 23:39
|
|
Posts: 2,355 |
Thanked: 5,249 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
@ Barcelona
|
#184
|
Regarding resolution: yes, but on the other hand it's hardware accelerated rendering (or should be), and it turns out that resolution isn't much of a factor
|
2009-11-24
, 23:41
|
Posts: 5,335 |
Thanked: 8,187 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Pennsylvania, USA
|
#185
|
...every phone I've ever had has been totally disappointing for the first 2 weeks while I bump into limitations and bugs, until I get used to ignoring those and using the useful bits.
|
2009-11-24
, 23:52
|
|
Posts: 2,427 |
Thanked: 2,986 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#186
|
|
2009-11-24
, 23:59
|
|
Posts: 50 |
Thanked: 70 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Tampere, Finland
|
#187
|
As a geek I will definitely enjoy the phone...but for normal people this will fall waaaaaay short, especially when you can go get an iphone for 200$ that can actually scroll smoothly.
The Following User Says Thank You to kalle For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-11-25
, 00:01
|
Posts: 114 |
Thanked: 113 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#188
|
Yes, I think it is self-explanatory in that the scrolling looked good to me.
Don't forget - the iPhone is usually rendering pages designed for it or other mobile devices. In the N900 you are rendering full desktop web pages.
I take back what I said about your device being defective. I don't see a single thing wrong with the scrolling.
I'd like to see you post a video of the N900 and iPhone side by side and make sure the web page is exactly the same (not just the URL - the actual served up content). Make sure the CSS is the same, etc. Maybe create a test page and save it to disk.
I wager that the N900 will easily outperform the iPhone.
Yeah, I didn't see a thing wrong with the video you posted.
What am I missing?
BTW, I will have my device tomorrow. I'll test this stuff too.
|
2009-11-25
, 00:05
|
Posts: 607 |
Thanked: 450 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Washington, DC
|
#189
|
And isnt that exactly what Nokia has been saying from day one: this is step 4/5, this is NOT end user ready.
The Following User Says Thank You to DaveP1 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-11-25
, 00:15
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#190
|
No Problem. I will do a video of the 3GS vs the N900 scrolling this very thread. It will be pretty embarrassing mainly because the amazing browser on the N900 doesn't even render this site properly.
Tags |
close me please, cry me a river, delete me, old thread, worstthreadever |
Thread Tools | |
|
As far as the web browser goes i would really want to see just simple back and forward buttons on it. Don't understand why did they brought this from S60 that i was 100% not to see. Flash performance still needs to get better and i'm confident that 10.1 will give us that. Just hoping to see it in near future. Pages drawing speed should be improved.
Other than those that i have been pleasently surprised about the browser and i do really think it's easily in the top 5 smartphone web browsers out there. Those things fixed and this will be truly amazing.
As far as rest of the phone goes i knew exactly what i was getting so no nasty problems for me, but there's lots of missing from this phone and with the hardware some performance aspects should be improved. While people want to compare Nokias past efforts with Symbian imo it's just unfair to compare very different OS and what uk based Symbian as a company was(owned by Nokia since last year) to Maemo that's in a different position than in the past inside and outside Nokia. They need to do just the same as Android no less, but wont mind if they do it faster Plus i sure feel more confident about Maemo with the community around here compared to Symbian where it was really scattered around and you really where not as involved and so close to developers.