|
2008-03-12
, 14:35
|
|
Posts: 1,463 |
Thanked: 81 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ UK
|
#12
|
|
2008-03-18
, 12:49
|
Posts: 85 |
Thanked: 29 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
|
#13
|
|
2008-03-18
, 13:23
|
Posts: 2,152 |
Thanked: 1,490 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Czech Republic
|
#14
|
|
2008-03-18
, 13:51
|
Posts: 85 |
Thanked: 29 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
|
#15
|
Can be also some conflicting pppd options, see also
http://www.nabble.com/MPPE-required%...html#a10192337
If insmod worked and you see line about mppe in kernel log (type dmesg) it may be something else than missing mppe. See also http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=16562, do you see "sent [LCP TermReq id=0x2 "MPPE required but not available"]" line too?
|
2008-03-18
, 14:12
|
Posts: 85 |
Thanked: 29 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
|
#16
|
|
2008-03-18
, 14:23
|
Posts: 2,152 |
Thanked: 1,490 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Czech Republic
|
#17
|
I checked the /etc/ppp/options file and all the PAP directives are commented out.
insmod worked. dmesg produces the line:
"PPP MPPE Compression module registered"
And finally, yes, I do have the line in the debug log:
"sent [LCP TermReq id=0x2 "MPPE required but not available"]"
just after the line:
"MPPE required, but MS-CHAP[v2] auth not performed"
|
2008-03-18
, 14:24
|
Posts: 2,152 |
Thanked: 1,490 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Czech Republic
|
#18
|
|
2008-03-18
, 14:35
|
Posts: 85 |
Thanked: 29 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
|
#19
|
|
2008-03-18
, 16:09
|
Posts: 85 |
Thanked: 29 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
|
#20
|
(Windows doesn't really support IPSec that well in XP)
Setting up IPSec/Openvpn saved me considerable time in admin, and it performed far better (IMHO)