![]() |
2008-01-07
, 00:36
|
Posts: 76 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ Long Island NY
|
#11
|
![]() |
2008-01-07
, 00:56
|
Posts: 215 |
Thanked: 44 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#12
|
![]() |
2008-01-07
, 06:37
|
|
Posts: 198 |
Thanked: 273 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Helsinki, Finland
|
#13
|
I wouldn't want to make any assumptions, but Nokia says to disconnect the charger during flashing. Since the charger triggers a software routine in the O/S, I assume that may be because it could interfere with the flashing process.
I think it's likely that the charger does provide power throughout the flashing process if connected, but it's also quite possible that it doesn't, and there's no way to know for sure.
![]() |
2008-01-07
, 14:36
|
|
Posts: 3,404 |
Thanked: 4,474 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ Germany
|
#14
|
![]() |
2008-01-07
, 14:46
|
Posts: 215 |
Thanked: 44 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#15
|
![]() |
2008-01-07
, 14:53
|
Posts: 215 |
Thanked: 44 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#16
|
If the instructions are stating anything else, please file a bug @ maemo.org, because they are bogus.
![]() |
2008-01-07
, 15:10
|
|
Posts: 1,310 |
Thanked: 820 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Irving, TX
|
#17
|
I don't recall having to reflash the BIOS on my Windows PC when a bit of beta software went wrong. In fact, I've never even had to re-install Windows to fix a problem - and I've used a lot of beta-quality Windows software since Windows 1.0. I've certainly never been concerned that my hardware might need to be sent in for repair. I think it was a design error for the battery charging management routine not to be in ROM firmware. That's why I'm unhappy with Nokia. I don't know what it was about the Mediabox installation that broke it - does it matter?
![]() |
2008-01-07
, 15:13
|
|
Posts: 3,404 |
Thanked: 4,474 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ Germany
|
#18
|
I don't recall having to reflash the BIOS on my Windows PC when a bit of beta software went wrong. In fact, I've never even had to re-install Windows to fix a problem - and I've used a lot of beta-quality Windows software since Windows 1.0. I've certainly never been concerned that my hardware might need to be sent in for repair. I think it was a design error for the battery charging management routine not to be in ROM firmware. That's why I'm unhappy with Nokia. I don't know what it was about the Mediabox installation that broke it - does it matter?
![]() |
2008-01-07
, 16:04
|
|
Posts: 739 |
Thanked: 159 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Germany - Munich
|
#19
|
(and I'm only fogiving Mediabox because it's beta software, use at own risk)
The only man who makes no mistakes is the man who never does anything.
![]() |
2008-01-07
, 16:34
|
Posts: 215 |
Thanked: 44 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#20
|
Well, it matters in that you opened a thread blaming particularly MediaBox in its title for your trouble. I don't think it was this software alone that broke your OS, but I'm definitely interested in the circumstances under which this has happened.
The Following User Says Thank You to DJames1 For This Useful Post: | ||