|
2008-02-24
, 13:04
|
|
Posts: 1,412 |
Thanked: 594 times |
Joined on Aug 2005
@ Recife, Brazil
|
#12
|
|
2008-02-24
, 13:20
|
Posts: 1,418 |
Thanked: 1,541 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#13
|
Thanks for any minute you're able to put on this we really appreciate. As most of the users facing problems are not that linux-savvy it's even harder to get debug info from them.
for me it would be just a big tar.gz file and unpacking it would install it with a wizard (to already configure media folders, safe modes, where to store things etc)
Canola is a hobby project here, so while working on it we do need to do "commercial" work to pay the bills , so you get the dimension of the problem : /
|
2008-02-24
, 15:23
|
|
Posts: 1,412 |
Thanked: 594 times |
Joined on Aug 2005
@ Recife, Brazil
|
#14
|
The app manager is fine. It is the complicated framework of dependencies that is causing problems. These depndencies will cause problems with or without the app manager, I am afraid.
|
2008-02-24
, 18:02
|
Posts: 5 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#15
|
BTW, when trying to update from Canola2 Beta3 to Beta5 today, Application Manager failed to find the lightmediascanner0 library. After removing Beta3 with Canola-Cleanup, the Application Manager just plain fails to install Beta5, no details given.
|
2008-02-24
, 23:08
|
|
Posts: 1,412 |
Thanked: 594 times |
Joined on Aug 2005
@ Recife, Brazil
|
#16
|
|
2008-02-25
, 00:00
|
|
Posts: 356 |
Thanked: 27 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ Madrid, Spain
|
#17
|
Sometimes we are behind firewalls and while you can browse you will not be able to install files.
|
2008-02-25
, 08:06
|
|
Posts: 33 |
Thanked: 3 times |
Joined on Aug 2006
@ Chichester
|
#18
|
|
2008-02-25
, 08:52
|
|
Posts: 356 |
Thanked: 27 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ Madrid, Spain
|
#19
|
Then I tried doing the same thing with my N800 and it installed perfectly at home and work.
|
2008-02-25
, 09:05
|
|
Posts: 33 |
Thanked: 3 times |
Joined on Aug 2006
@ Chichester
|
#20
|
As to reusing external stuff being the whole point of Linux, it has also been a weak point of Linux for a very long time. Aside from the DLL-hell issue, you simply can't expect scores of packages from unrelated people to work together flawlessly. It won't happen. Never does. That's exactly why more conservative BSD-based systems have "correct" versions of all the important bits (libraries, includes, PERL, etc.) installed somewhere safe in the system, as part of the core distribution, and never changed.