Reply
Thread Tools
Hedgecore's Avatar
Posts: 1,361 | Thanked: 115 times | Joined on Oct 2005 @ Toronto, Ontario, Canada
#11
Hopefully GAIM notifications didn't interrupt reading the article - - though how could it since the 770 has no IM software. (Wasn't GAIM the topic of the 'How to Port an App' tutorial - - one of the first apps ported?)

I'm not being a 770 zealot... I just really think that the sheer number of unrealistic expectations skewed that review to hell and back.

This morning the subway pulled out just as I got onto the platform and my 770 failed to fly from my pocket and transform into an SUV to whisk me to work. 3 out of 10 because the case looks nice.
 
mschoen's Avatar
Posts: 79 | Thanked: 8 times | Joined on Mar 2006
#12
The problem is, people review this product, from an out of box, stupid person approach. It's not a phone, so don't try and make it one; just because Nokia makes it. I happen to think its the best thing since Zaurus'. The clientell buying this product isn't the consumer report run-of-the-mill person. This is for people who want a flexable tool that doesnt run something ******ed like Widows CE. I happen to think the 770 is damn near perfect. It also has a GREAT help community that loves to contribute to the better of the 770, for FREE! IMHO, you take you're "smart phone" running windows CE and shove it
 
Posts: 34 | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on Nov 2005
#13
What is up with the 3 hours battery time? I used the 770 to watch videos for 4 hours straight on a flight from Frankfurt to New York and the fact is, I didn't have to stop because of the battery running out of power, but because I had no more videos to watch.
 
Posts: 55 | Thanked: 2 times | Joined on Mar 2006
#14
Since the video comes from flash memory, there is no drive eating up battery power.

Two things seem to really eat up battery time: 1. Keeping your screen on at it's brightest setting. 2. Heavy WiFi, eg. streaming.
 
Posts: 45 | Thanked: 1 time | Joined on Dec 2005
#15
I, too, don't expect to get a full day's use out of the battery on my 770. And it's not because I haven't been properly uncharging it all the way, like a previous poster suggested. Of course I uncharge it all the way -- the battery goes dead on me!
 
Posts: 23 | Thanked: 1 time | Joined on Jan 2006 @ Portland
#16
I'm coming late to this thread, & it's hard to think of anything worth writing that the rest of you haven't already written, but one thing does occur to me:

Did Rob Enderle write this review?

(A quick Google search failed to uncover any comments about this well-known & often-quoted pundit on the Nokia 770. So we have something else to look forward to.)

Geoff
 
RogerS's Avatar
Posts: 772 | Thanked: 183 times | Joined on Jul 2005 @ Montclair, NJ (NYC suburbs)
#17
Originally Posted by dandrewk
Two things seem to really eat up battery time: 1. Keeping your screen on at it's brightest setting. 2. Heavy WiFi, eg. streaming.
If you're offline, and the screen isn't set to brightest, I'd say 6 hours' use is what you should be getting.

Of course, pointing to offline capability may not be the optimal response for a device sold as an internet tablet.
__________________
N900 Guide Brief intro to the Nokia N900 (http://n900guide.com/)
Maemoan since July 2005 )
 
Posts: 2 | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on Jan 2006
#18
who f***s cnet i just love my nokia 770
 
Posts: 25 | Thanked: 3 times | Joined on Jan 2006
#19
My review of CNET:

A nice website, contains lots of tech information. You want to make a phone call? Your SOL. Not possible through Cnet. Finally had to go over to skype.

You want 300dpi resolution like your copy of Wired magazine? Your stuck with 72 dpi.

Want info on how to plant your begonias? CNET falls short here too. Try gardening.ca.

Want to view CNET on your Blackberry/Treo or Pocket PC pda? Sorry again. Unless you like scrolling side to side for every line of text you read, the website is essentiallly unusable. (Even if you do have a big blue ethernet connection for your blackberry.)


CNET Rating: 2 / 10

Summary: Very narrow focus. Hard to surf on a PDA. 72dpi. No phone.

Last edited by sandstorm; 2006-04-07 at 13:29.
 
Posts: 25 | Thanked: 1 time | Joined on Feb 2006
#20
I know this is more of a pointless reply, But i just want to say that that review of cnet was amazing. My editor only gave it a 2.6/10, but me and everyone else here are going to go with a 9/10. Oh well... One guy hates it so i guess he wins right?
 
Reply

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:45.