![]() |
2008-11-11
, 11:47
|
Posts: 1 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
|
#11
|
![]() |
2008-11-11
, 13:29
|
|
Posts: 170 |
Thanked: 23 times |
Joined on Oct 2008
@ Annapolis, MD, USA
|
#12
|
I look forward to the opportunity to actually give them some money...
Is it possible I am missing something with the activation? My Xohm page shows my device and MAC address as having an active "product" (xohm for the day) yet the WiMax icon on the top bar flashes and I can't access any site other than xohm and cycling power to the device didn't work either.
![]() |
2008-11-12
, 12:54
|
Posts: 1,513 |
Thanked: 2,248 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ US
|
#13
|
I'd like to second that request. Many of us Nokia N810 WiMax folks would probably like a forum to discuss XOHM-specific issues or WiMax comparisons. I've can confirm XOHM signals in Baltimore (MD), Hanover (MD), Washington (DC), and Reston (VA).
I'm still in the midst of rebuilding mine after a crash yesterday, but I'll start reporting signal strengths and bandwidth if I can.
![]() |
2008-11-12
, 13:10
|
|
Posts: 170 |
Thanked: 23 times |
Joined on Oct 2008
@ Annapolis, MD, USA
|
#14
|
btw, XOHM is supposedly being phased out in favor of Clearwire early next year. Hopefully, there will be no interruption of wimax service in BAL, DC, Chicago and Boston.
The Following User Says Thank You to rjzak For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2008-11-12
, 13:45
|
Posts: 1,513 |
Thanked: 2,248 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ US
|
#15
|
Don't you mean that the FTC is allowing Spring and Clearwire to put their eggs in one basket, so to speak? If you mean the name, I'm sure XOHM is here to stay, as Clearwire is a company name, not necessarily a service name, and Clearwire sounds so 1990's while XOHM sounds 21st century. Just a thought.
And I have to disagree about the perceived economic bustitude of the N810WE. Its an investment in a new technology (yes, new for US, pun intended, not new as in brand freaking new). And like any new technology, its a gamble. Think of all those people who dumped money on HD-DVD discs and players, and all those who invested in Blueray. WiMax may come and go, or may stay and evolve. But I for one prefer it over the UMTS/HSDPA/EVDO lot.[/
![]() |
2008-11-12
, 13:54
|
|
Posts: 170 |
Thanked: 23 times |
Joined on Oct 2008
@ Annapolis, MD, USA
|
#16
|
![]() |
2008-11-12
, 14:00
|
|
Posts: 1,310 |
Thanked: 820 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Irving, TX
|
#17
|
![]() |
2008-11-12
, 14:06
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#18
|
Why are they putting HSDPA into the tablet just now and not 2 years ago? It is an acknowledgement that the wimax edition won't sell in the volumes that they need because the coverage just isn't there (and other reasons).
I was not speaking to general wimax vs. 3G and 3.5G comparisons and the future of wimax.
![]() |
2008-11-12
, 14:07
|
|
Posts: 170 |
Thanked: 23 times |
Joined on Oct 2008
@ Annapolis, MD, USA
|
#19
|
![]() |
2008-11-12
, 14:09
|
|
Posts: 170 |
Thanked: 23 times |
Joined on Oct 2008
@ Annapolis, MD, USA
|
#20
|
Not exactly. There is not necessarily any connection between decisions involving wimax vs hsdpa, except for the fact that it makes sense to address different network types. It really is too early to tell with Xohm, but it is a 4G technology and one or more of such will certainly prosper. Keep in mind Nokia is equally vested in LTE technology (on the network side).
And if wimax eventually fails, the tablets designed for it can still function just as those without.
![]() |
Tags |
n810 wimax, virginia, wimax, xohm |
Thread Tools | |
|