Active Topics
-
Maemo repository (8)
to Community by Maemish - 20 hrs, 21 mins ago -
Porting apps to Leste (44)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by norayr - 1 day ago -
List of well performing apps on Leste (35)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by smatkovi - 3 days, 22 hrs ago -
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (13)
to SailfishOS by edp17 - 4 days, 20 hrs ago -
Sailfish OS for the Samsung Galaxy Note 4 (SM-N910C) - (treltexx) (79)
to SailfishOS by edp17 - 4 days, 20 hrs ago -
U-Boot for Nokia RX-51 with BootMenu (updated version 2012.10-rc3-1) (843)
to Alternatives by Arno_11 - 5 days, 1 hr ago - more...
|
2009-10-13
, 01:25
|
|
Posts: 16 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#12
|
Rakia, if you read here, it actually said that "Clarification needed: it's not clear to a first-timer whether this should be an existing user name from the host linux system, or a new user name for use only inside the scratchbox environment.]" on steps #3.
On step #5 it mentioned "Proceed further to run the Maemo SDK installer script. This script is run as 'user' outside the scratchbox environment. "
if in step #3 I typed:
$ sudo ./maemo-scratchbox-install_5.0.sh -u adhika
can I run step #5 as user 'adhika' as well?
what does "a user outside scratchbox environment" means?
Thank you,
Adhika
On step #5 it mentioned "Proceed further to run the Maemo SDK installer script. This script is run as 'user' outside the scratchbox environment. "
if in step #3 I typed:
$ sudo ./maemo-scratchbox-install_5.0.sh -u adhika
can I run step #5 as user 'adhika' as well?
what does "a user outside scratchbox environment" means?
Thank you,
Adhika
 |
|
2009-10-13
, 08:55
|
|
Posts: 3,397 |
Thanked: 1,212 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Netherlands
|
#13
|
Yes, that will work.
A user outside scratchbox environment means a working user account on the Linux system. Usually, that means the non-root account you're using. Your current account you're logged into on the Linux system is probably suitable.
PS: the Maemo SDK documentation on wiki has been updated with clarifications regarding Linux x86-64 and disabling VDSO32. It should be easier with sysctl than editting bootloader such as GRUB(2).
A user outside scratchbox environment means a working user account on the Linux system. Usually, that means the non-root account you're using. Your current account you're logged into on the Linux system is probably suitable.
PS: the Maemo SDK documentation on wiki has been updated with clarifications regarding Linux x86-64 and disabling VDSO32. It should be easier with sysctl than editting bootloader such as GRUB(2).
__________________
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
| The Following User Says Thank You to allnameswereout For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2009-10-13
, 13:55
|
|
Posts: 16 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#14
|
Thanks a lot Rakia, now I can see the desktop
 |
|
2009-10-13
, 14:21
|
|
Posts: 2,355 |
Thanked: 5,249 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
@ Barcelona
|
#15
|
(Hijacking the topic)
In case you're in Scratchbox1 compiling mood, you may want to test this patch which should fix the VDSO issue once for all.
In case you're in Scratchbox1 compiling mood, you may want to test this patch which should fix the VDSO issue once for all.
|
|
2009-10-14
, 12:21
|
|
Posts: 3,397 |
Thanked: 1,212 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Netherlands
|
#16
|
Originally Posted by javispedro
(Totally ontopic IMO
(Hijacking the topic)
In case you're in Scratchbox1 compiling mood, you may want to test this patch which should fix the VDSO issue once for all.
)If I understand this patches the libc6 which SB1 uses? I just checked, and my SB1 has a newer libc6 (although not as new as most recent Linux distributions), so its questionable whether it still patches and compiles clean since the patch patches a libc6 from 2005.
Does SB2 also have this issue? What is the status of SB2?
You may want to include this in the wiki.
__________________
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
|
|
2009-10-14
, 12:36
|
|
Posts: 2,355 |
Thanked: 5,249 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
@ Barcelona
|
#17
|
Originally Posted by allnameswereout
Newer? It's still 2.3.2 aka ancient. Check http://www.scratchbox.org/cgi-bin/da...glibc/Makefile . You're probably checking the chroot/target libc version, which should match the versions the devices use.
I just checked, and my SB1 has a newer libc6 (although not as new as most recent Linux distributions), so its questionable whether it still patches and compiles clean since the patch patches a libc6 from 2005.
Originally Posted by allnameswereout
No AFAIK.
Does SB2 also have this issue?
| The Following User Says Thank You to javispedro For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2009-10-15
, 16:04
|
|
Posts: 3,397 |
Thanked: 1,212 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Netherlands
|
#18
|
Originally Posted by javispedro
True. Do you know a way to use APT with deb-src and Scratchbox? I'm now compiling it manually, and this is getting ugly.
Newer? It's still 2.3.2 aka ancient. Check http://www.scratchbox.org/cgi-bin/da...glibc/Makefile . You're probably checking the chroot/target libc version, which should match the versions the devices use.
__________________
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
|
|
2009-10-15
, 16:11
|
|
Posts: 2,355 |
Thanked: 5,249 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
@ Barcelona
|
#19
|
Originally Posted by allnameswereout
I do not know what you mean with deb-src and Scratchbox...
True. Do you know a way to use APT with deb-src and Scratchbox? I'm now compiling it manually, and this is getting ugly.
BTW, to use the above glibc patch you need to pull the whole sbox source (and it'll take a lot to build).
|
|
2009-10-18
, 20:32
|
|
Posts: 3,397 |
Thanked: 1,212 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Netherlands
|
#20
|
Originally Posted by javispedro
Yeah I tried that but I have x86-64 bit environment on this machine.
I do not know what you mean with deb-src and Scratchbox...
BTW, to use the above glibc patch you need to pull the whole sbox source (and it'll take a lot to build).
With deb-src I meant to do it in elegant way:
1) Add deb-src entry to get Scratchbox source to /etc/apt/sources.list
2) Exec apt-get -b source scratchbox (or whatever packages are required)
3) Add the patch in scratchbox-directory/debian/files
4) Build the .deb packages.
If one don't care about dirty way then only 1 person just compiles that glibc w/patch and it'd be fixed, right? Not whole scratchbox is required to be recompiled then. Only stuff which linked to glibc static.
__________________
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
$ sudo ./maemo-scratchbox-install_5.0.sh -u `whoami`
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!