jessi3k3
|
2009-11-25
, 23:43
|
Posts: 304 |
Thanked: 176 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#11
|
|
2009-11-26
, 19:40
|
Posts: 304 |
Thanked: 176 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#12
|
he video recording of Nokia N900 sounds pretty good on paper. WVGA (848 x 480 pixels) is the second highest resolution among mobile phones we have tested, after the 720p of the Omnia HD. The 24fps framerate also sounded pretty decent.
Unfortunately, the Nokia N900 doesn't actually manage to keep up this framerate, especially in the first several seconds of a video. That results in subjectively quite choppy videos.
The compression applied is also a bit excessive and we would have been happier with a bit more saturated colors.
To put it simply, the Nokia N900 doesn't deliver the performance that one might expect by reading the specs. You can see for yourselves by downloading the sample video below.
|
2009-11-26
, 20:01
|
|
Posts: 1,589 |
Thanked: 720 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Arlington (DFW), Texas
|
#13
|
The Following User Says Thank You to christexaport For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-11-26
, 20:34
|
Posts: 261 |
Thanked: 73 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#14
|
|
2009-11-26
, 23:22
|
|
Posts: 190 |
Thanked: 101 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#15
|
The Following User Says Thank You to horus For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-11-27
, 07:14
|
Posts: 304 |
Thanked: 176 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#16
|
|
2009-11-27
, 07:25
|
Posts: 739 |
Thanked: 114 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#17
|
|
2009-11-27
, 09:50
|
|
Posts: 600 |
Thanked: 742 times |
Joined on Sep 2008
@ England
|
#18
|
I don't buy into the argument that 25fps is sufficient for the human eyes.
|
2009-11-27
, 15:42
|
Posts: 296 |
Thanked: 126 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ New York City
|
#19
|
|
2009-11-27
, 22:49
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 7,109 |
Thanked: 8,820 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
#20
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to qole For This Useful Post: | ||