|
2009-12-11
, 20:12
|
|
Posts: 4,783 |
Thanked: 1,253 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ norway
|
#12
|
|
2009-12-11
, 20:13
|
Posts: 226 |
Thanked: 63 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Maldives
|
#13
|
|
2009-12-11
, 20:55
|
Posts: 150 |
Thanked: 93 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Pennsylvania, US
|
#14
|
|
2009-12-11
, 21:01
|
Posts: 51 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Seattle
|
#15
|
|
2009-12-22
, 12:35
|
Posts: 5 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#16
|
|
2009-12-22
, 12:50
|
Posts: 22 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Dortmund, Germany
|
#17
|
|
2009-12-22
, 12:55
|
Posts: 287 |
Thanked: 127 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Sweden
|
#18
|
|
2009-12-22
, 13:12
|
|
Posts: 3,404 |
Thanked: 4,474 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ Germany
|
#19
|
|
2009-12-22
, 13:13
|
|
Posts: 4,783 |
Thanked: 1,253 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ norway
|
#20
|
The Following User Says Thank You to tso For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
connection, gprs, incoming calls, interrupted, n900 |
Thread Tools | |
|
So really, when compared to a normal transfer, the extra timeslot taken up by the voice call isn't much.
Personally, I'd be happy with 3+1 and voice. (that would limit you to about 170Kbps downstream in ideal conditions, or 100 more realistically)
The feature is called dual transfer mode, btw.
Edited to add: And having just looked it up, N900 supports it.