The Following User Says Thank You to fms For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-01-18
, 18:47
|
|
Posts: 1,559 |
Thanked: 1,786 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Boston
|
#12
|
|
2010-01-18
, 18:51
|
Posts: 1,418 |
Thanked: 1,541 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#13
|
Since we're kinda off in la-la hypothetical land with the discussion, let me throw at you a scenario: it is discovered that a popular app in Extras has a timebomb built into it that will do something really heinous in one more day. What do we do?
First of all, we do need a demote button and it does need to be accessible to official testers.
They need to be able to demote something from Extras found to be in violation of QA criteria, and able to throw testing versions back to -devel when blockers are discovered (to avoid wasting tester's time).
Second of all, the system needs a built-in facility to inject a stub package into Extras that displays a customized message when installed or executed.
|
2010-01-18
, 19:00
|
|
Posts: 1,559 |
Thanked: 1,786 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Boston
|
#14
|
Tell Tero Kojo, Niels Breet, or Jeremiah Foster, who remove the application. Why are you asking? Has this ever happened?
No. No single person, except the dedicated repository adminstrator, should have the right to single-handedly demote or promote packages.
Why does the system need that?
There are no "official testers" right now.
|
2010-01-18
, 19:00
|
|
Posts: 2,669 |
Thanked: 2,555 times |
Joined on Apr 2007
@ Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
|
#15
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to zerojay For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-01-18
, 19:07
|
Posts: 1,418 |
Thanked: 1,541 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#16
|
Because there are hours when none of them are around. This is a la-la land hypothetical situation with equally hypothetical and general solutions that rely on no one person to work.
The relying on individuals doesn't seem to be getting us far, so maybe it's not a good strategy?
|
2010-01-18
, 19:16
|
|
Posts: 1,559 |
Thanked: 1,786 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Boston
|
#17
|
|
2010-01-18
, 19:20
|
Posts: 1,418 |
Thanked: 1,541 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#18
|
|
2010-01-18
, 19:20
|
Posts: 237 |
Thanked: 157 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ San Diego, CA
|
#19
|
First of all, we do need a demote button and it does need to be accessible to official testers. They need to be able to demote something from Extras found to be in violation of QA criteria, and able to throw testing versions back to -devel when blockers are discovered (to avoid wasting tester's time).
|
2010-01-18
, 19:22
|
|
Posts: 1,070 |
Thanked: 1,604 times |
Joined on Sep 2008
@ Helsinki
|
#20
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to VDVsx For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
extras-tesing, finishing the job, quality assurance, quarantine, software quality, user testing |
Thread Tools | |
|
So, as you might have guessed, I am very skeptical on any "improvements" anyone is going to bring to the Extras vetting process. If anything, we need less enforcement, not more.
Computer and Console Emulators for Maemo, Symbian, and more.
Pack Rat: The Maemo Package Aggregator.