Notices


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 40 | Thanked: 2 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#11
Originally Posted by ndi View Post
If you have a high-quality source with nice shades, like animation, could you try 2400 kbps on same settings and see if you can tell the difference? Maybe it's just me.
like other guy said just because they don't have a HD out put so don't want to waist my time plus they'll take really long time to encode the movie ..I'm using blu ray source ..
 
Posts: 188 | Thanked: 34 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#12
Originally Posted by jakiman View Post
I've tested up to 800x434 @ 5500kbps (yes, 5.5Mbps) for xvid in an avi container and it played smooth. Tried 6000kbps and it became choppy. This is using mplayer btw.
xvid is a lot easier on the system than h264 but your trading off that ease of processing for a older inferior codec.

That 5500kb/s is probably only equal to 1200kb/s H264 and your file size is going to be larger. When your looking at less than 64gb of space to use I think the space really matters and once you encode it just one time you have it for life so I think the extra 20 minutes or so to encode is worth it as its an investment.

You can just start the encoding and go do something else, no need to sit and watch it.
 
Posts: 216 | Thanked: 72 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Switzerland
#13
@all

Thanks for the feedback and the leads. I will start testing as soon as I "finaly" will get my N900.

Markus
 
Posts: 2,829 | Thanked: 1,459 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Finland
#14
Originally Posted by ViciousXUSMC View Post
...
That 5500kb/s is probably only equal to 1200kb/s H264 and your file size is going to be larger.....
How do you know? h.264 (right profile, read wiki) decoding is hw assisted.
 
Posts: 188 | Thanked: 34 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#15
Originally Posted by slender View Post
How do you know? h.264 (right profile, read wiki) decoding is hw assisted.
How can you not know H264 > Xvid

its evolution of codecs H264 is new & better and Xvid is old.

But due to the fact Xvid is older it ran on older hardware so it has lesser system requirement to run than H264.

But I dont understand what your trying to say to me anyways?
 
Posts: 2,829 | Thanked: 1,459 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Finland
#16
oh. Still bit tired. Sorry. I read for some reason that you stated that limit for h.264 is 1200 kb/s. Sorry for that.
 
Reply

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:49.